I love Walkers, I mean REALLY love them. I think they are the most beautiful US coin ever minted. If I were rich, I'd have a giant pile of them that look like that.
I didn't realize that a '44-D could have almost no hand detail + incomplete breast feathers and still make 67.
Still learning . . .
John
Need the following OBW rolls to complete my 46-64 Roosevelt roll set: 1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S. Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
I love Walkers, I mean REALLY love them. I think they are the most beautiful US coin ever minted. If I were rich, I'd have a giant pile of them that look like that.
You might have trouble assembling a giant pile that looked like that.
<< <i>You might have trouble assembling a giant pile that looked like that. >>
That's what I was thinking - nicely toned walkers of any date are fairly scarce....I don't think you could make a giant pile if you were to acquire every one of them!
I love Walkers, I mean REALLY love them. I think they are the most beautiful US coin ever minted. If I were rich, I'd have a giant pile of them that look like that.
Russ, NCNE >>
This post seems eerily similar to one you made about a month or more ago about a Walker you imaged for smoeone else.
I just got Jeff Ambio's book on Walking Liberty Halves yesterday. (Yep, I bought the book before I start the series). I do have a few, birth year set... but I would like to build a nice series. So, off on my next numismatic endeavour... Cheers, RickO
Beautiful coin. I looked up this coin on the price guide page and found some interesting trivia about this particular date. Just for general information
The February 2, 2003 issue of Coin World reported a 1944-D Half Dollar with an unusual designer's monogram on the reverse that appeared to be hand-engraved. A second example was reported in the February 16, 2004 edition of Coin World.
By the way.. I will glady entertain all offers for your untoned, underpriced Walkers... I have no intention of including any doctored or tarnished coins (really the same thing) in my series. Cheers, RickO
<< <i>By the way.. I will glady entertain all offers for your untoned, underpriced Walkers... I have no intention of including any doctored or tarnished coins (really the same thing) in my series. Cheers, RickO >>
Beautiful coin Russ! I love the toning on this one (usually I do not like toning).
The Walkers are my favorite series as well. I am working on a short set (1941-1947) in PCGS MS64 (all that my budget can afford) and need only 2 more coins to complete that set. Once that is done, I will start working backwards and someday hope to complete the entire series of Walkers in PCGS MS64. Any nicely tones Walkers I find in PCGS MS64 are typically 2x to 3x the price of white coins.
I would never have picked that for a superlative gem coin with the missing hand detail. I don't know the grading vagaries of Walkers by date - is the 44-D known for incomplete strikes?
Comments
I didn't realize that a '44-D could have almost no hand detail + incomplete breast feathers and still make 67.
Still learning . . .
John
1947-P & D; 1948-D; 1949-P & S; 1950-D & S; and 1952-S.
Any help locating any of these OBW rolls would be gratefully appreciated!
You might have trouble assembling a giant pile that looked like that.
<< <i>You might have trouble assembling a giant pile that looked like that. >>
That's what I was thinking - nicely toned walkers of any date are fairly scarce....I don't think you could make a giant pile if you were to acquire every one of them!
<< <i>
PCGS MS67.
I love Walkers, I mean REALLY love them. I think they are the most beautiful US coin ever minted. If I were rich, I'd have a giant pile of them that look like that.
Russ, NCNE >>
This post seems eerily similar to one you made about a month or more ago about a Walker you imaged for smoeone else.
Russ, NCNE
Now that is a very nice coin, brother. I'd love to have a short set lookin' like that.
<< <i>Love the toning!
I didn't realize that a '44-D could have almost no hand detail + incomplete breast feathers and still make 67.
Still learning . . .
John >>
I agree........Walkers are tough to grade IMHO.
Ray
to get emotionally involved with your coins.
Camelot
Mike
The February 2, 2003 issue of Coin World reported a 1944-D Half Dollar with an unusual designer's monogram on the reverse that appeared to be hand-engraved. A second example was reported in the February 16, 2004 edition of Coin World.
``https://ebay.us/m/KxolR5
ms65
ms65*
ms66
<< <i>By the way.. I will glady entertain all offers for your untoned, underpriced Walkers... I have no intention of including any doctored or tarnished coins (really the same thing) in my series. Cheers, RickO >>
You mean, I ship em; you dip em?
My question on Walker strikes.
I'm still learning too.
Added: Forgot to say NICE COIN!
Garrow
Nice Walker, BTW.
3 prominent obverse hits makes you wonder a little also.
The Walkers are my favorite series as well. I am working on a short set (1941-1947) in PCGS MS64 (all that my budget can afford) and need only 2 more coins to complete that set. Once that is done, I will start working backwards and someday hope to complete the entire series of Walkers in PCGS MS64. Any nicely tones Walkers I find in PCGS MS64 are typically 2x to 3x the price of white coins.
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1