Is this date one that is notorious for a soft strike??? And do most of the them look AUish? But to the expert eyes of Washington obsessed collectors like Hyperion it is easy to recognize???
<< <i>Is this date one that is notorious for a soft strike??? And do most of the them look AUish? But to the expert eyes of Washington obsessed collectors like Hyperion it is easy to recognize??? >>
"-S" is for soft strike. In my newbie opinion, when something has zero real wear it's a soft strike, except for a couple ticks...
no luster breaks, tho I defer to the washie-experts here. I can be corrected !
Advanced collector of BREWERIANA. Early beer advertising (beer cans, tap knobs, foam scrapers, trays, tin signs, lithos, paper, etc)....My first love...U.S. COINS!
I can understand that opinion from the pics... this is an in-hander... motted toning masks the surface quality, anyways.... it's resting at peace in my dansco, tho Im sure it can be really argued this is NOT a crackout coin
That is not a soft strike. That is exactly what a Washington quarter was supposed to look like off the dies. It looks like an MS65 or MS66 with original skin.
<< <i>That is not a soft strike. That is exactly what a Washington quarter was supposed to look like off the dies. It looks like an MS65 or MS66 with original skin. >>
this is an expert to whom I defer I was thinking of the perceived flatness in the curl by the ear
Comments
To support LordM's European Trip, click here!
PCGS MS-65
I was wondering how many would pickout test the AU58 guess....
<< <i>Is this date one that is notorious for a soft strike??? And do most of the them look AUish? But to the expert eyes of Washington obsessed collectors like Hyperion it is easy to recognize???
"-S" is for soft strike. In my newbie opinion, when something has zero real wear it's a soft strike, except for a couple ticks...
no luster breaks, tho I defer to the washie-experts here. I can be corrected !
<< <i>My guess was MS63. >>
I can understand that opinion from the pics... this is an in-hander... motted toning masks the surface quality, anyways.... it's resting at peace in my dansco, tho Im sure it can be really argued this is NOT a crackout coin
<< <i>Ill cut it short....
PCGS MS-65
I was wondering how many would pickout test the AU58 guess.... >>
Are you saying that the first picture is a PCGS holder?
<< <i>
<< <i>Ill cut it short....
PCGS MS-65
I was wondering how many would pickout test the AU58 guess.... >>
Are you saying that the first picture is a PCGS holder?
same coin. first 2 shots are in the rattler holder.
second 2 shots are of the same coin SANS holder, au naturel (natural?)
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Ill cut it short....
PCGS MS-65
I was wondering how many would pickout test the AU58 guess.... >>
Are you saying that the first picture is a PCGS holder?
same coin. first 2 shots are in the rattler holder.
second 2 shots are of the same coin SANS holder, au naturel (natural?) >>
Interesting! I wonder what it would grade today, if you sent it back in?
In honor of the memory of Cpl. Michael E. Thompson
the coin appears hazy with subdued luster which would probably keep it from GEM status...
I say MS64..
"Senorita HepKitty"
"I want a real cool Kitty from Hepcat City, to stay in step with me" - Bill Carter
<< <i>That is not a soft strike. That is exactly what a Washington quarter was supposed to look like off the dies. It looks like an MS65 or MS66 with original skin. >>
this is an expert to whom I defer