Options
1944-P/P overpunched Jefferson nickel
Blackhawk
Posts: 3,899 ✭✭✭
Does anyone recognize the variety of this doubled mint mark on a 1944-P war nickel?
"Have a nice day!"
0
Comments
You mean re-punched mint mark, right?
and they're cold.
I don't want nobody to shoot me in the foxhole."
Mary
Best Franklin Website
<< <i>Griv, if you don't know what your looking at, maybe best not to comment... >>
An overpunch refers to a different mint mark. Put the weed down.
<< <i>That is RPM-003, one of the nicer ones. >>
I agree looks like a MDS got a full coin pic of the coin
<< <i>
<< <i>Griv, if you don't know what your looking at, maybe best not to comment... >>
An overpunch refers to a different mint mark. Put the weed down. >>
That's a minor error of semantics, and it was still a heck of a lot closer than "minor die deterioration/seperation, leaving a slice of the coin metal as a result."
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>Does anyone recognize the variety of this doubled mint mark on a 1944-P war nickel?
This book probably recognizes several.
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Griv, if you don't know what your looking at, maybe best not to comment... >>
An overpunch refers to a different mint mark. Put the weed down. >>
That's a minor error of semantics, and it was still a heck of a lot closer than "minor die deterioration/seperation, leaving a slice of the coin metal as a result."
Sean Reynolds >>
What are you, BM's mom or just a BM?
<< <i>
<< <i>Does anyone recognize the variety of this doubled mint mark on a 1944-P war nickel?
This book probably recognizes several.
I would recommend " The Jefferson Nickel RPM Book an attribution and pricing guide" by James Wiles
a much more comprehensive reference for RPMs and in conjunction with the book leo recommended you have the Jefferson variety basics pretty well covered..
Griv, in the words of the great one, Wayne Gretzky, "you talk too much!"
No offense, but can't you just say "I don't know it all and I was way off, nice coin!" Your attacks on others and defense of your obvious wrong answer isn't going to get you much credibility here, MS-70 moderns or not. You are not a die variety guy and that is okay, no one knows everything.
I would not characterize that as a doubling. Maybe minor die deterioration/seperation, leaving a slice of the coin metal as a result.
That is the most un-informed answer I have heard all month. That is a RPM if one existed.
<< <i>Griv,
No offense, but can't you just say "I don't know it all and I was way off, nice coin!" Your attacks on others and defense of your obvious wrong answer isn't going to get you much credibility here, MS-70 moderns or not. You are not a die variety guy and that is okay, no one knows everything.
I would not characterize that as a doubling. Maybe minor die deterioration/seperation, leaving a slice of the coin metal as a result.
That is the most un-informed answer I have heard all month. That is a RPM if one existed. >>
Excuse me, but let me recap for you my friend. I am a bullion and late modern coin collector. I have NEVER EVER posted that I know CRAP about anything prior to 1986. I am posting an opinion so why is it necessary to single my comments out and hold them up to discredit me? I am always the first to admit when I am FOS so taking cheap shots like this is a discredit to the forum and to me, if that matters.
<< <i>jfoot13, you know how us Jefferson variety collectors get! >>
I do... you'll never know how hard it was for me not to post a pic of my 43/2 and ask if this was the same " minor die deterioration/seperation, leaving a slice of the coin metal as a result."
<< <i>Cheap shots?? I am just stating my opinion?? You were wrong and this is obviously an RPM
<< <i>Cheap shots?? I am just stating my opinion?? You were wrong and this is obviously an RPM
Excuse me once again. I am often wrong, but I take offense at your comments. You are a mean-spirited individual and have zero respect for others. Do you want me to admit I don't know crap here? Okay, BH/BM, I DON'T, so there you go. Do you take pride in being a moron?
<< <i>
<< <i>jfoot13, you know how us Jefferson variety collectors get! >>
I do... you'll never know how hard it was for me not to post a pic of my 43/2 and ask if this was the same " minor die deterioration/seperation, leaving a slice of the coin metal as a result."
Better yet, you could have posted a pic of a 1955 Doubled Die and been told "great separation on the second strike".
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>jfoot13, you know how us Jefferson variety collectors get! >>
I do... you'll never know how hard it was for me not to post a pic of my 43/2 and ask if this was the same " minor die deterioration/seperation, leaving a slice of the coin metal as a result."
Better yet, you could have posted a pic of a 1955 Doubled Die and been told "great separation on the second strike".
Sean Reynolds >>
Sean Sean Sean......