I assume there's no damage on the wrapper containing the cent which would be consistent with something striking the coin from outside the wrapper? If not, I'd guess strike-through.
"government is not reason, it is not eloquence-it is a force! like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master; never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." George Washington
I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector. Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
I suspect a close-up of the bottom of the "R" would be pretty definitive. I believe the weakness is caused by insufficient metal in the area and a close up will reveal metal folded over the voids from the strike.
BXBOY143 - The vise grips were a joke. It appears to be a strikethrough. It might be post mint damage, but the toning pattern in and around the anomoly makes me think something was squeazed between the planchet and die.
I think the planchet was laminated or otherwise defective before the strike. If the coin were struck through something like grease, I would expect the bottom of the R in LIBERTY to be filled in. Either way the coin is definitely "as struck" and not damaged, I've seen Mint Set coins damaged by the heat sealing mechanism and they usually have a waffle pattern on the highest points of the design or the rim.
Sean Reynolds
Incomplete planchets wanted, especially Lincoln Cents & type coins.
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>BXBOY143 - The vise grips were a joke. It appears to be a strikethrough. It might be post mint damage, but the toning pattern in and around the anomoly makes me think something was squeazed between the planchet and die. >>
i know i was just saying that is quite a set an it is sad that some people actually ruin coins for what reason who know
Comments
-Paul
-PAUL
<< <i>
so you're thinkin' post mint damage.....eh?
<< <i>
no possible way the rim is crisp
<< <i>
<< <i>
no possible way the rim is crisp >>
NO PROLEM!!! PICK YOUR POISON BELOW.
Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
the weakness is caused by insufficient metal in the area and a close up will reveal
metal folded over the voids from the strike.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>
no possible way the rim is crisp >>
NO PROLEM!!! PICK YOUR POISON BELOW.
that is quite a set ...well here are some more pix if they help.....mint cello has no issues what so ever
thanx again to all
Sean Reynolds
"Keep in mind that most of what passes as numismatic information is no more than tested opinion at best, and marketing blather at worst. However, I try to choose my words carefully, since I know that you guys are always watching." - Joe O'Connor
<< <i>BXBOY143 - The vise grips were a joke. It appears to be a strikethrough. It might be post mint damage, but the toning pattern in and around the anomoly makes me think something was squeazed between the planchet and die. >>
i know i was just saying that is quite a set an it is sad that some people actually ruin coins for what reason who know