Home› Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
Options

Scanning cards in holders?

mmyncmmync Posts: 678 ✭
in Trading Cards & Memorabilia Forum
I am looking for a little advice on how to quality scans of cards that are already in a holder. I know that most veterans of the hobby follow the saying "Buy the card and not the holder". Here are 2 cards that I think are really nice, but they look kinda blah in the scans.







image







image

Comments

  • swartz1swartz1 Posts: 4,911 ✭✭✭
    look good from where I am sitting...


    Looking for 1970 MLB Photostamps
    - uncut


    Positive Transactions - tennesseebanker, Ahmanfan, Donruss, Colebear, CDsNuts, rbdjr1, Downtown1974, yankeeno7, drewsef, mnolan, mrbud60, msassin, RipublicaninMass, AkbarClone, rustywilly, lsutigers1973, julen23 and nam812, plus many others...
  • alifaxwa2alifaxwa2 Posts: 3,104 ✭✭✭
    Yea, they do look a little out of focus. I think the only option would be to upgrade your scanner.
    Looking to have some custom cuts or plain custom cards built? PM me.

    Commissions

    Check out my Facebook page
  • mmyncmmync Posts: 678 ✭


    << <i>Yea, they do look a little out of focus. I think the only option would be to upgrade your scanner. >>




    It's an all in one print/scan/copy and its about 8 months old. But I really think it does a nice job on raw cards.
  • hotmushhotmush Posts: 657
    Actually, I find that scanning cards while in Ultra Pro penny sleeves causes the color to really pop (for some reason). But scanning them raw, or in Card Savers causes it to look gauzy. Just a tip.
    Just a few examples of raw cards up for auction right now. (not a plug).

    auctions
    Do You Collect image Baseball 1937,1965-94,2008-09?
    Or Regional Canadian Baseball Issues?
    Come be a contributor to the OPC Baseball Wiki. It's free and easy!
    OPeeChee.Wikispaces.Com
  • cravetoppscravetopps Posts: 1,134
    try scanning at a higher resolution or depending on your scanning software, you can sharpen the image and make other "fine tuning" tweaks which may help.

    image
    Mark B.

    Seeking primarily PSA graded pre-war "type" cards

    My PSA Registry Sets

    34 Goudey, 75 Topps Mini, Hall of Fame Complete Set, 1985 Topps Tiffany, Hall of Fame Players Complete Set
  • BobaFett72BobaFett72 Posts: 7,304
    Hey HotMush... why is this card only VG ?

    creases? stains? looks pretty decent....
    image
  • hotmushhotmush Posts: 657
    To be honest, I try to grade conservatively.
    This card is a little more yellow on the borders than a pack fresh version and the corners are a little soft.
    There are no creases, though.
    I never add 'could be a PSA X' to my auctions but I would say it probably would pull a 6.5 or 7.
    Do You Collect image Baseball 1937,1965-94,2008-09?
    Or Regional Canadian Baseball Issues?
    Come be a contributor to the OPC Baseball Wiki. It's free and easy!
    OPeeChee.Wikispaces.Com
  • iamthegreatcornholioiamthegreatcornholio Posts: 3,366


    << <i>

    << <i>Yea, they do look a little out of focus. I think the only option would be to upgrade your scanner. >>




    It's an all in one print/scan/copy and its about 8 months old. But I really think it does a nice job on raw cards. >>



    It's likely a LIDE type scanner and not a CCD type scanner. LIDEs are nice because they're cheap and thin, but scanners that use CCD technology can handle depth better so the card in the slab looks crisp.
Sign In or Register to comment.