Assuming ANACS was puchased what holder and grading would you like to see: POLL
TexasNationals
Posts: 3,837 ✭
Well what would you like?
0
Comments
Current Holders= What you see now.
New Holder= Something we haven't seen yet.
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
I thought Whitman had big plans for ANACS... I guess I was wrong
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>ANACS should consider canning the new holder and going back to the old one. Further, it should offer variety services and be a nitch player. They will not complete with NGC or PCGS, however, a reasonable variety service seems to be needed.
I thought Whitman had big plans for ANACS... I guess I was wrong >>
Apparently they did have plans- selling them off!
Leo
The more qualities observed in a coin, the more desirable that coin becomes!
My Jefferson Nickel Collection
Old holder with net grading, forget all the latest fluff. It didn't work. Go back to what worked even though it is tough to swallow some crow.
“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock." - Thomas Jefferson
My digital cameo album 1950-64 Cameos - take a look!
<< <i>Companies should not treat employees in such a manner - if indeed the details reported here are accurate. We (my company) would NEVER do such a thing to our employees. If a company sale were made, conditions to care for the people would be part of the deal - or NO deal. Cheers, RickO >>
I think my employer would. During the last employee policy handbook update they dwelled more on termination of employment issues than they did on policies that would encourage folks to stay; kinda like settin you up to dump you like a trash can if they decide they don't need you.
Leo, I really like that slab, but I would settle for the old one.
One last thought regarding "net grading" and "detail-only" grading. I've never liked the idea, for two reasons. First, because the numeric grade becomes increasingly useless (if not misleading) as the degree of the coin's problems increase. And second, because a collector doesn't want to be reminded by the TPG label every time he looks at his coin why it sucks. However, with a greater reliance on online cert verification, TPGs could provide this information (and much more) online, not on the label, allowing potential buyers to make a better informed purchase, without the aforementioned drawbacks.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
No grade at all. Just a $Price. This totally alleviates the problem for liner coins and net
graded coins. No more deciding is it MS64 or MS65, or what does it grade with BU details
with a big ol' scratch - just assign it a proper $Price. If the submitter doesn't like the $Price
assigned and/or the market changes, just crack it out and resubmit for a new $Price.
Yes, I'm kidding.
<< <i>I've always liked the mini-slab idea. Although all of the services rejected the idea, it's now time to revisit it, thanks to the Chinese. I figure one of the biggest reasons for not offering a mini-slab in the past may have been related to the security of the slab. Now that the security of a slab has been mooted by counterfeit slabs, the TPGs will be forced to implement online cert verification with images. And once that's done, a mini-slab becomes more viable.
One last thought regarding "net grading" and "detail-only" grading. I've never liked the idea, for two reasons. First, because the numeric grade becomes increasingly useless (if not misleading) as the degree of the coin's problems increase. And second, because a collector doesn't want to be reminded by the TPG label every time he looks at his coin why it sucks. However, with a greater reliance on online cert verification, TPGs could provide this information (and much more) online, not on the label, allowing potential buyers to make a better informed purchase, without the aforementioned drawbacks. >>
Andy- that is by far the best thought I have seen in a very long while- the problem though is the input from the TPG graders, they see coins and do this in a mynoot time frame (I spelt it wrong on purpose)- to go into a brief explanation as to why - takes typing skills for some beyond comparison- they would need a stenographer sitting next to them to take notes.
It would be a challenge thats for sure.