So I emailed this ebay seller...
GoldenEyeNumismatics
Posts: 13,187 ✭✭✭
asking if they could provide a better image of the reverse of this coin. I couldn't see the "D" mintmark, but if it fact it was there then it would be a great snag for $250.
Well, I got this response to my question:
"I'm sorry my camera is not good enough. I can tell you that my 2 pictures I have on there are not good either. I can tell you the D is raised, and in my picture it looks like the bottom is wore off, but it is not. It iseasily legible. It says 2 1/2 D.
Thank you, and Merry Christmas..Julie"
Well, I got this response to my question:
"I'm sorry my camera is not good enough. I can tell you that my 2 pictures I have on there are not good either. I can tell you the D is raised, and in my picture it looks like the bottom is wore off, but it is not. It iseasily legible. It says 2 1/2 D.
Thank you, and Merry Christmas..Julie"
0
Comments
Russ, NCNE
Link
It's right after the 2 1/2 just like she says.
Ray
<< <i>Looks to me like a stolen picture from this auction...what do you think?
Link >>
Yep, it sure is. Nice catch!
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>
<< <i>Looks to me like a stolen picture from this auction...what do you think?
Link >>
Yep, it sure is. Nice catch!
Russ, NCNE >>
Which explains why seller can't get a better picture.
1969s WCLR-001 counterclash
<< <i>Well here's some more bad pics same seller link >>
No wonder she stole the photos,
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
<< <i>She needs to steal a camera...
The name is LEE!
Ike Specialist
Finest Toned Ike I've Ever Seen, been looking since 1986
<< <i>
<< <i>Well here's some more bad pics same seller link >>
No wonder she stole the photos, >>
Not this time...these are her own bad pictures. The prior auction did not sell, so she relisted it. I see at least she got the Title correct this time...Must have been tipped off that the D is not a mint mark.
Rob
"Those guys weren't Fathers they were...Mothers."