Home› U.S. Coin Forum

Would any of these grade? (Or BB?)

gecko109gecko109 Posts: 8,231 ✭
in U.S. Coin Forum
1807

image


image

Another '07

image

image

And finally an '06

image

image

All opinions are appreciated!!!

Comments

  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
    The 06 would maybe grade, but I don't think the others will. And I don't think a sticker is in your future, unfortunately. image
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • LongacreLongacre Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The 06 would maybe grade, but I don't think the others will. And I don't think a sticker is in your future, unfortunately. image >>




    Scratch that. I missed the damage on the 06 reverse. I don't think any will holder, and therefore no stickers either. image
    Always took candy from strangers
    Didn't wanna get me no trade
    Never want to be like papa
    Working for the boss every night and day
    --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
  • SilverEagles92SilverEagles92 Posts: 6,787 ✭
    1) I could see it in a slab, I have seen worse.
    2) Should easily slab.
    3) Is that Graffiti or adjustment marks on the reverse?
    image
    To support LordM's European Trip, click here!
  • RollermanRollerman Posts: 1,873 ✭✭✭✭✭
    No would be my guess. The '06 is damaged on the reverse. Having said that, I'd still like to own them!
    Pete
    "Ain't None of Them play like him (Bix Beiderbecke) Yet."
    Louis Armstrong
  • gecko109gecko109 Posts: 8,231 ✭
    Adjustment marks....yeah, thats the ticket!!! (SNL skit). Im sure they are someone's engraving. Not too far off from the PCGS graded chopmarked trade dollars though. Afterall, arent both examples post mint damage???
  • dohdoh Posts: 6,457 ✭✭✭
    I think the middle coin, the second 1807, has the best shot. The first one has obvious wiping lines and the third coin is oddly colored plus has some cuts on the eagle's neck.
    Positive BST transactions with: too many names to list! 36 at last count.
  • NHSBaseballNHSBaseball Posts: 2,470 ✭
    1807 #2 might have a chance.
    "College men from LSU- went in dumb, come out dumb too..."
    -Randy Newmanimage
  • gecko109gecko109 Posts: 8,231 ✭
    So far, most of you feel that if any of the 3 would slab, it would be #2. Does this coin have enough pizzaz to get a VG8? Higher? Lower?
  • UtahCoinUtahCoin Posts: 5,359 ✭✭✭✭✭
    #2 maybe. 1&3 probably not
    I used to be somebody, now I'm just a coin collector.
    Recipient of the coveted "You Suck" award, April 2009 for cherrypicking a 1833 CBHD LM-5, and April 2022 for a 1835 LM-12, and again in Aug 2012 for picking off a 1952 FS-902.
  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,466 ✭✭✭✭✭
    #1 likely BB for harsh cleaning.
    #2 may get in, not sure of rim damage or not
    #3 scratches/graffiti on the reverse, so, no

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • 123cents123cents Posts: 7,178 ✭✭✭
    I think #2 has a good chance of grading.
    image
  • BlindedByEgoBlindedByEgo Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭✭
    #2.

    Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file
You can use Markdown in your post.
Home • U.S. Coin ForumComment As ...