<< <i>I've copied and pasted the pictures in Microsoft Word and have magnified the pictures to 500X.
In my opinion, the pictures have been photoshopped.
Seems that the fields have been 'smoothed over' a bit. It's not as obvious as with other sellers, but I think this is the case.
Perhaps other forum members can try this and report back. >>
In the first link, just by looking at the pics, it appears the fields where the luster turns from light to dark has been grayed out a little. Coincidence that this is right where the prime focal area is? idk.
One guy left follow up feedback saying he sent his coin to NGC and it came back BB for enhanced surfaces. If that's the case the seller is probably polishing his coins.
Ol' Grandpa had one hell of a collection. This seller has been selling Ol' Grandpa's collection for months on end. The seller even changed his name a few months back to keep the party alive. He still has 100% Positive with 3 neutrals. But on the Item as described he is 4.8/5.0
I found that he sold an 1885-CC GSA Morgan on November 27th (Sold 1885-CC), and he has one listed for sale ending December 17th (For Sale 1885-CC). The pictures are identical for these two. That can't be right. He also sold a raw 1916 SLQ for over 10k and got positive feedback. No returns, all raw, no paypal. I'd be very nervous.
Comments
-
Paul
Russ, NCNE
In my opinion, the pictures have been photoshopped.
Seems that the fields have been 'smoothed over' a bit. It's not as obvious as with other sellers, but I think this is the case.
Perhaps other forum members can try this and report back.
"“Those who sacrifice liberty for security/safety deserve neither.“(Benjamin Franklin)
"I only golf on days that end in 'Y'" (DE59)
<< <i>I've copied and pasted the pictures in Microsoft Word and have magnified the pictures to 500X.
In my opinion, the pictures have been photoshopped.
Seems that the fields have been 'smoothed over' a bit. It's not as obvious as with other sellers, but I think this is the case.
Perhaps other forum members can try this and report back. >>
In the first link, just by looking at the pics, it appears the fields where the luster turns from light to dark has been grayed out a little. Coincidence that this is right where the prime focal area is? idk.
<< <i>For some reason "Grandpa's Estate" gets rather ridiculous money in most of his auctions.
Russ, NCNE >>
Grandpa's grandson sure has a lot of positive feedback!!
25 inf 1/14 Gold Dragons ,never surrender, over come and adapt
and hold at all cost!
But that estate has pulling in top dollar for " grandpas collection ".
It would be nice to hear from someone that has purchased these raw "beauties".
Edit: look at the rims on the Buff, am I missing something or do proofs have square rims and primo bold sharp lettering
<< <i><< For some reason "Grandpa's Estate" gets rather ridiculous money in most of his auctions.
Russ, NCNE >>
Grandpa's grandson sure has a lot of positive feedback!! >>
He has some interesting followup feedback from a bidder who left positives and then got educated the hard way.
Russ, NCNE
IHC
You wouldn't believe how long it took to get him to sit still for this.
<< <i>BTW, anyone know what FDC means? >>
fleur de coin
I don't ever recall seeing that kind of token in a mint set. Anybody familiar with it?
Edited to add: Packaged after the fact but the packaging looks super clean.
The name is LEE!