Grade the Frankie

Cladiator · November 30, 2007 3:39PM

The label says 64, what do you say?

commoncents05 · November 30, 2007 3:42PM

Looks like a solid 64, IMO. I don't know about the FBL, it's not my thing.

-Paul

prooflike · November 30, 2007 3:43PM

64 seems about right.

coinsarefun · November 30, 2007 3:59PM

64 is about right

DenverDave · November 30, 2007 11:46PM

The bottom lines are fairly weak and the hit across them dose not help...

I do not think it would FBL at either service...

fiftycom · November 30, 2007 11:51PM

Surfaces have 65 quality but no FBL. IMO.

LeeG · November 30, 2007 11:53PM

64++ or 65-. Depends on the grader and day of submission. Not FBL.

jmj3esq · November 30, 2007 11:59PM

MS64 is right.

SkyMan · December 1, 2007 1:00AM

64-5 no fbl.

ricko · December 1, 2007 1:25AM

63/64.. no FBL... Cheers, RickO

pharmer · December 1, 2007 1:56AM

65

Ronyahski · December 1, 2007 4:20AM

64, looks like a dip and retone. Close to FBL.

mcheath · December 1, 2007 4:51AM

64 is dead on. Nice clean fields but the srtike hits above his ear limit it to a 64.

razzle · December 1, 2007 5:19AM

I'm guessing, REALLY guessing, that it got FBL and that's what prompted your post.

Cladiator · December 1, 2007 6:33AM

<< <i>I'm guessing, REALLY guessing, that it got FBL and that's what prompted your post. >>

Nope, it's graded MS64.

Ronyahski · December 1, 2007 7:45AM

<< <i>

<< <i>I'm guessing, REALLY guessing, that it got FBL and that's what prompted your post. >>

Nope, it's graded MS64. >>

It's in the lower value range and looks like the kind of coin that could get a bump to 65 witth no FBL, or a bump to FBL with 64, but not both.

Mercury10c · December 1, 2007 8:33AM

64, but maybe a higher end 64, non-FBL

JJM · December 1, 2007 9:07AM

64 is fair, a tick or 2 to many on the lines for FBL IMO

Grade the Frankie

Comments

Leave a Comment