You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
<< <i>A 40 at a minimum needs to have the top feather on the wings delineated, which this doesn't. Nice looking and a nice year! >>
Is a complete band required also for 40? >>
Top feather delineation and a complete band are both required for an XF40. I looked at dozens of slabbed VF35s and this looks better than some but is still a 35; a nice 35.
In the land of the blind the one-eyed man is king.
Thanks for your input. As always, this is one of the greatest forums. I would have likely not submitted this coin if not for some of you saying that the hairlines did not look harsh enough for a bodybag. Thanks again.
I'm seeing alot of Barber Halves get xf40's without a complete band in pcgs holders. Strike softness is an issue in the forhead area on some earlier "S" mint coins and often times you will have a full wing seperation reverse without a full lower band obverse. It seems that when you reach the level of both complete details, there becomes enough luster and overall look to justify a 45. Quarters are a little different. Wingtips seem to always be softer struck and wear very quickly, especially "O" and some "P" mint issues, so you can have an xf quality band but loose it on the reverse. I'd like your chances of getting a 40 on that if the obverse hairlines weren't evident. You may have just gotten "netted".
Edited to say: Nah, I just looked again. Not a 40.
We're all born MS70. I'm about a Fine 15 right now.
Comments
PCGS Registries
Box of 20
SeaEagleCoins: 11/14/54-4/5/12. Miss you Larry!
But came back at VF-35.
<< <i>thanks for the responses. eel I got cheated a little on this one. My thinking was EF-40.
But came back at VF-35.
Looking at the obverse hairlines, be happy it came back slabbed at all!!!
<< <i>A 40 at a minimum needs to have the top feather on the wings delineated, which this doesn't. Nice looking and a nice year! >>
Is a complete band required also for 40?
<< <i>
<< <i>A 40 at a minimum needs to have the top feather on the wings delineated, which this doesn't. Nice looking and a nice year! >>
Is a complete band required also for 40? >>
Top feather delineation and a complete band are both required for an XF40. I looked at dozens of slabbed VF35s and this looks better than some but is still a 35; a nice 35.
I'd like your chances of getting a 40 on that if the obverse hairlines weren't evident. You may have just gotten "netted".
Edited to say: Nah, I just looked again. Not a 40.