AT or NT? Pop 1 of 2, 1880 $1 PR68CAM PCGS

karpman9

AT or NT? Also, can anyone comment on the spotting that is present on both the obverse and reverse? Are these milk spots like those we see on modern ASE proofs? Anyone have an idea on current market value for this particular piece?







Thanks for your insights in advance.

Best regards,

DennisH

Looks both real and incredibly nice to me.

Value? All I'm sure of is "large".

shmort6552

That is a fantastic looking coin!!!! The PCGS guide stops at PF67CAM!!!

I'd vote NT.

You can forward that to my address when you're finished with it!!

Bruce

Dennis88

Definitely NT, probably from the original "mint" packaging these early Proof coins came in.

I've seen this kind of toning before, but never something as as this coin

Dennis

Connecticoin

Very Likely NT. One reason is that someone would have to be incredibly stupid to mess with a MS-68 Proof Morgan.

ricko

Beautiful coin... does not look like milk spots... no idea what it could be... Toning? Well, likely NT.. I do not think anyone would mess with a coin like that.... it has so much value just in it's minted condition.... Cheers, RickO