Speaking of the June special.....
Davemri
Posts: 2,011 ✭✭✭
How long has everyone had to wait to have their cards opened and invoiced? My package of 60 cards arrived June 27th according to my del conf.. but still not entered.
dave
dave
FINISHED 12/8/2008!!!
0
Comments
Date Received: 06/30/2007
Date of Grades Posted: No Date Specified
Date Shipped: No Date Specified
according to my values and my needs. Nothing holds dominion over me, I stand alone as the ruler of my life.
FINISHED 12/8/2008!!!
Forget blocking him; find out where he lives and go punch him in the nuts. --WalterSobchak 9/12/12
Looking for Al Hrabosky and any OPC Dave Campbells (the ESPN guy)
<< <i>can I buy that Don Hutson in 7 off of you then? >>
lol.....I said stop submitting, not buying.....
<< <i>Did you call them and ask them why it wasn't logged yet? >>
No because I wasn't sure how long it was taking with everyone else's order...I'm just damn frustrated...
FINISHED 12/8/2008!!!
Paul
Dave and Paul, hopefully your grades will pop soon.
FINISHED 12/8/2008!!!
Ron
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
<< <i>Frankly, the constant complaints about this are getting old, and PSA should do something about it. For example, if PSA were to offer a $11/5 day approximate special vs. a $13/5 day guaranteed turnaround, it would at least offer some transparency about orders. I say this with all due respect to PSA: Please improve your customer service. Your customers are the lifeblood of your company. They deserve better.
Ron >>
PSA cannot do this, for the simple reason that if customer service improved and turnaround times became faster (with a FIFO system) then these boards would die within two weeks. Nobody would have anything left to discuss.
A shout out to Terri G. for getting me straightened out in less than 5 minutes. Thanks!!
<< <i>It's for this exact reason I rarely submit cards under the $13/ 5 day service level. It's not really guaranteed. You're better off sending them in under a bulk sub. and rolling the dice on a quick turnaround. I've had some bulk subs graded within 10 days of them being logged in. Why pay $8 more per card to get frustrated with the slow service?
Dave and Paul, hopefully your grades will pop soon. >>
Well thats if the value of your cards arent that high. Its a good deal for cards between $100 and $500 in claimed value.
Collecting:
Brett Favre Master Set
Favre Ticket Stubs
Favre TD Reciever Autos
Football HOF Player/etc. Auto Set
Football HOF Rc's
FINISHED 12/8/2008!!!
The real problem I see is that PSA nearly has a monopoly on this part of the industry. Since PSA-graded cards almost always bring the most money, those of us in it to maximize profits are forced to go the PSA route. Of course, they know this and therefore apparently don't think they have to provide even a moderate amount of decent service. I know there are good people that work at PSA, I simply think it's an issue of being severely under-staffed. I have noticed grading inconsistencies as well, which reflects poor quality control, but that is also probably as a result of having to rush through orders due to being understaffed.
Long wait times aside, I think one of the most frustrating things about submissions is not knowing how close they are to being graded. i would think it would be relatively easy to implement a staging/tracking process where people could at least get an idea of where exactly in the process their sub is. Enabling us to check this online would save them hours in fielding phone calls, so should be a good ROI for them.
All-time favorite athletes:
Steve Sax, Steve Garvey, Larry Bird, Jerry Rice, Joe Montana, Andre Agassi, Karch Kiraly, Wayne Gretzky, Ichiro Suzuki, Andres Galarraga, Greg Maddux.
"Make the world a better place... punch both A-Rods in the face (Alex Rodriguez and Andy Roddick)!"
Late 60's and early to mid 70's non-sports
<< <i>
<< <i>It's for this exact reason I rarely submit cards under the $13/ 5 day service level. It's not really guaranteed. You're better off sending them in under a bulk sub. and rolling the dice on a quick turnaround. I've had some bulk subs graded within 10 days of them being logged in. Why pay $8 more per card to get frustrated with the slow service?
Dave and Paul, hopefully your grades will pop soon. >>
Well thats if the value of your cards arent that high. Its a good deal for cards between $100 and $500 in claimed value. >>
I forgot about the value of the cards. I was only thinking of cards under $75 in value. Sometimes you have no choice in the type of service level to use other than value of the item. For cards under $75 I wouldn't use any other service level other than bulk. If I didn't have enough cards to submit under a bulk level, I would simply wait until I accumulated more cards.
Fingers crossed.
Now, if the grading Gods would only be as benevolent...
Frank
Sets - 1970, 1971 and 1972
Always looking for 1972 O-PEE-CHEE Baseball in PSA 9 or 10!
lynnfrank@earthlink.net
outerbankyank on eBay!
"All evil needs to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
<< <i>I am afraid to call them and ask since I have read horror stories from people who called and asked. Apparently they all got poor grades for calling and bothering them... >>
Urban myth...
according to my values and my needs. Nothing holds dominion over me, I stand alone as the ruler of my life.
<< <i>Urban myth... >>
Truthfully? You have had good experience with calling on a sub?
If so then I will gladly give them a jingle on monday morning. I know they are busy but now I have a bad feeling seeing a post about a July special being added to their database
<< <i>
<< <i>Urban myth... >>
Truthfully? You have had good experience with calling on a sub?
If so then I will gladly give them a jingle on monday morning. I know they are busy but now I have a bad feeling seeing a post about a July special being added to their database >>
The few times I've had to call it had zero affect on #1 how long the sub took, or #2 the grades given. In fact, if your issue is that they have received it, yet it hasn't been logged it would behoove you to call in case there is a problem with the paperwork somewhere. Based on past history I would give it a week between day they receive and day they log it in. If it goes longer than that chances are there's a problem that a quick call can correct.
To infer that the CS Reps and the graders are somehow in cahoots to screw over anyone who happens to call in with a question is ridiculous. Strangely enough, I tend to get better grades on the subs that take the longest..It's the ones that go in on a 45 day sub and pop in 1 week that I typically get the worse grades..Not saying there is anything behind that, but just my experience in my 8 years of sending subs to PSA...
Jason
according to my values and my needs. Nothing holds dominion over me, I stand alone as the ruler of my life.
I also do not think that calling about your order = a greater likelihood of poor grades. That's a black helicopter theory that's simply crazy.
Ron
Buying Vintage, all sports.
Buying Woody Hayes, Les Horvath, Vic Janowicz, and Jesse Owens autographed items
<< <i>Well I double and triple checked my submission forum to make sure I didnt do anything wrong which would hold my submission. I too sent my sub from NJ on the 28th. USPS has reported the package was signed for on the 3rd of July. I guess I will just wait and see. I am afraid to call them and ask since I have read horror stories from people who called and asked. Apparently they all got poor grades for calling and bothering them... >>
I wouldn't be worried at all. I've seen the sheets of registered mail that gets signed for there, it's a mass delivery sheet called a firm sheet, with all of the packages in that bundle signed for all at the same time.
It's possible there were 50-100 packages signed for along with yours on the same sheet, and when they arrive they get put on a card in line to get sorted into grading level.
At the beginning of the month they get more subs than the rest of the month, due to last minute submitters. They could have gotten hundreds or thousands of subs on monday and tuesday 7/2 and 7/3.
I think give them a day or 2 to get them all logged in, maybe call on wednesday if you haven't heard anything. Chances are very good that they're on a cart waiting to get entered.
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i>Urban myth... >>
Truthfully? You have had good experience with calling on a sub?
If so then I will gladly give them a jingle on monday morning. I know they are busy but now I have a bad feeling seeing a post about a July special being added to their database >>
The few times I've had to call it had zero affect on #1 how long the sub took, or #2 the grades given. In fact, if your issue is that they have received it, yet it hasn't been logged it would behoove you to call in case there is a problem with the paperwork somewhere. Based on past history I would give it a week between day they receive and day they log it in. If it goes longer than that chances are there's a problem that a quick call can correct.
To infer that the CS Reps and the graders are somehow in cahoots to screw over anyone who happens to call in with a question is ridiculous. Strangely enough, I tend to get better grades on the subs that take the longest..It's the ones that go in on a 45 day sub and pop in 1 week that I typically get the worse grades..Not saying there is anything behind that, but just my experience in my 8 years of sending subs to PSA...
Jason >>
I think there's something to this. My suspicion is that modern subs get more or less broken into two categories-- those that will require a loupe to grade (meaning the overall condition is superior) and those that can be more-or-less graded with the naked eye, with those subs in the former category being 'put off' by the graders for as long as possible (becaue they're going to be harder to grade).So, if two subs contain nothing but, say, 1985 McGwire RC's, the sub with the better condition cards will take longer to be returned.
<< <i>I think there's something to this. My suspicion is that modern subs get more or less broken into two categories-- those that will require a loupe to grade (meaning the overall condition is superior) and those that can be more-or-less graded with the naked eye, with those subs in the former category being 'put off' by the graders for as long as possible (becaue they're going to be harder to grade).So, if two subs contain nothing but, say, 1985 McGwire RC's, the sub with the better condition cards will take longer to be returned. >>
Sounds like a logical explanation. There are definitely some inconsistences with how and when some subs get graded and others don't. We know for a fact PSA doesn't use first in first out philosophy, so maybe this is the more likely scenario. We need an insider who can tell us the exact process that PSA uses to assign subs to graders...lol
Jason
according to my values and my needs. Nothing holds dominion over me, I stand alone as the ruler of my life.
<< <i>That would make a LOT of sense. I sent 59 modern cards that are from the 1984 topps set for my set on the set registry and 1 beat up card from topps 1966 which was the the sentimental card. I know the 84 topps arent worth a whole lot to many people here. Others will swear there will always be tons of Gem Mint 10s from that set. I dissagree 100% from experience. After weeding thru 32,000 plus cards all from rack pack cases. I was lucky to find the 59 cards to submit! 99% of the cards had corners with bad cut issues and centering issues on the front and/or the back. I will wait and see I am not in a super rush to get my cards back. Thanks for all of your input >>
Interesting about the 84 Topps... I noticed that that year is still pretty cheap to get a hold of unopened material. Not sure about racks but wax boxes seem to be available for $40-50 per. Not bad, considering 80-83 & 85 are pretty much well over $100 each. Of course, the main reason 84 is still so cheap is the lack of any big rookies (other than potentially Mattingly). The fact that Strawberry tanked his carreer didn't help that either My other theory about 84 Topps is that it's the first year that both Fleer & Donruss exceed topps in value and desireability. From 81 to 83, Topps was the definate leader, but that got flipped in 84 with Donruss way out in front, followed by Fleer, with Topps bringing up the rear. So, for 84 collectors, Topps being 3rd has most likely been a factor in keeping values down. Still though, the 84 Topps are pretty nice... to me, probably the second best look (behind the 83's). I have a ton of them ungraded with a few Superstars and HOFers out to PSA currently.
If what you're saying about only finding 59 possible 10's out of 32,000 raw cards holds consistant though, I suspect this may be a sleeper in the big money PSA-10 80's game. I've probably got about 10-15,000 commons that I need to look through myself.
All-time favorite athletes:
Steve Sax, Steve Garvey, Larry Bird, Jerry Rice, Joe Montana, Andre Agassi, Karch Kiraly, Wayne Gretzky, Ichiro Suzuki, Andres Galarraga, Greg Maddux.
"Make the world a better place... punch both A-Rods in the face (Alex Rodriguez and Andy Roddick)!"
EDIT ADD:
I can sleep at night now
>>Your shipment was entered on 07/09/2007. Further processing is pending.<<
My eBay Store
BigCrumbs! I made over $250 last year!
Yeeeeehaaaaaw
My eBay Store
BigCrumbs! I made over $250 last year!
<< <i>Ah I read that wrong. I thought you had posted they were shipped...I was too excited I guess. >>
when the grades pop I can post them if you like?
One order - a single $13/5 was entered on the 14th and the second order, June special, was entered in on the 15th. About 4-5 business days.
The grade on $13/5 popped in 3 days. As for the bulk order, it has been 15 business days later and still no grades. For you folks who submitted towards the end of the month, it appears they got slammed with orders and it may take a while for them to process it - Good luck.
1992 Topps FB Golds (72% complete)
1997 Topps FB Minted in Canton (10% complete)
1999 Topps FB Record Numbers Gold (80% complete)
2001 Topps FB MVP Promotion (35% complete)
Anyway, I'm done with my rant...
Dave
FINISHED 12/8/2008!!!
BTW, are you selling off stuff in your HOF set? You were hanging with me the whole way and then I see your set updated and there's cards missing...what gives?
My eBay Store
BigCrumbs! I made over $250 last year!
dave
FINISHED 12/8/2008!!!
<< <i>I recently submitted 4 orders in the same shipment. One of the submissions was for 7 free gradings from 1998 that got lost in some paperwork until recently. Beat that! Anyway, my guess is that my submission will end up on the problem shelf. Does anyone know if all orders in a shipment are placed on the shelf or just the problem order? >>
Did they still honor that voucher? They used to expire after 6 months and the freebie voucher for renewals was 12 months.
My eBay Store
BigCrumbs! I made over $250 last year!
My eBay Store
BigCrumbs! I made over $250 last year!
Cards sent 6/30 and logged in today (7/11). They must just be super busy.
Date Received: 05/05/2007
Date of Grades Posted: No Date Specified
Date Shipped: No Date Specified
My eBay Store
BigCrumbs! I made over $250 last year!
As long as the grades are good, I dont care how long I wait..lol
according to my values and my needs. Nothing holds dominion over me, I stand alone as the ruler of my life.
<< <i>Give 'em a call. I talked to customer service though and they said orders are going to be taking 45 days again. Bad news for me as I have 6 subs totalling about 200 cards. It's a lot of money to have tied up maybe they'll be nice to me. >>
I agree, I sent 450 cards on 6/26 and now will have $2,250 tied up until who knows when, but maybe it will be worth the wait as most were 2006 Football RCs, and maybe they will be back before the Playoffs start!!!
Bill