Home U.S. Coin Forum

Opinions on a 1921 Peace

Just looking for a little feedback on a 1921 Peace Dollar

image
«1

Comments

  • anablepanablep Posts: 5,203 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks 63 to me.

    Very nice and lustrous.
    Always looking for attractive rim toned Morgan and Peace dollars in PCGS or (older) ANA/ANACS holders!

    "Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."


    ~Wayne
  • robertprrobertpr Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭
    62/63. Nice strike for a '21. Much better than most of the garbage out there for this date.
  • Very nice image 66?
  • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977
    Certainly better struck for the date. Too bad its been dipped. MS65 for the strike.
  • relicsncoinsrelicsncoins Posts: 8,272 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a 64 to me.
    Need a Barber Half with ANACS photo certificate. If you have one for sale please PM me. Current Ebay auctions
  • richardshipprichardshipp Posts: 5,647 ✭✭✭
    It's got a 65 strike but the hits on it probably would keep it at 63/64 assuming it slabs.

    Honestly it seems there have been quite a few Peace BB's lately, including one of mine.
  • FrankcoinsFrankcoins Posts: 4,572 ✭✭✭
    MS63
    Frank Provasek - PCGS Authorized Dealer, Life Member ANA, Member TNA. www.frankcoins.com
  • GoldenEyeNumismaticsGoldenEyeNumismatics Posts: 13,187 ✭✭✭
    solid 63
  • ccmorganccmorgan Posts: 1,232 ✭✭✭
    I'll give it a 64...
    Love the 1885-CC Morgan
  • NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 11,033 ✭✭✭✭✭
    MS63
  • airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,693 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Nice strike, but really unattractive because of the dipping, IMO
    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,040 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Really nice strike for a '21! image

    I love the bright-white lustre too! image

    Could go either 63 (really clean fields; eye appeal; strike) or 62 (scuffs & ticks on cheekbone, cheek and eyebrow.)
    When in doubt, don't.
  • DNADaveDNADave Posts: 7,346 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Nice strike, but really unattractive because of the dipping, IMO >>



    I agree.

    No character.
  • They spelled 'TRUST' with a 'V', so I'll have to deduct half a point-- 63.5

    BTW, what's the tip off that it's been dipped?
  • WeissWeiss Posts: 9,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Easy '63, and I think the dipping is acceptable.
    We are like children who look at print and see a serpent in the last letter but one, and a sword in the last.
    --Severian the Lame
  • I was going to say the opposite of everyone here, that it has a rather weak strike for a '21, a year with notoriously strong strikes. And again the opposite, I wasn't impressed with the luster.

    That being said, it's a valuable coin.
  • DNADaveDNADave Posts: 7,346 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>They spelled 'TRUST' with a 'V', so I'll have to deduct half a point-- 63.5

    BTW, what's the tip off that it's been dipped? >>




    They look like this before they're dipped

    (In my opinion)

    image
  • No, they look like that when they've spent a few years in someone's exhaust pipe image
  • DNADaveDNADave Posts: 7,346 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>I was going to say the opposite of everyone here, that it has a rather weak strike for a '21, a year with notoriously strong strikes. And again the opposite, I wasn't impressed with the luster.

    That being said, it's a valuable coin. >>




    I'd like to find some "notoriously strong strikes" then.

    Thats just not the case. Rarely do you find one that isn't weak. Hair over the ear, right center of eagle.


  • << <i>

    << <i>I was going to say the opposite of everyone here, that it has a rather weak strike for a '21, a year with notoriously strong strikes. And again the opposite, I wasn't impressed with the luster.

    That being said, it's a valuable coin. >>




    I'd like to find some "notoriously strong strikes" then.

    Thats just not the case. Rarely do you find one that isn't weak. Hair over the ear, right center of eagle. >>


    1921's were the best struck peace dollars. image
  • LeeBoneLeeBone Posts: 4,824 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Could go either 63 (really clean fields; eye appeal; strike) or 62 (scuffs & ticks on cheekbone, cheek and eyebrow.) >>




    image
  • SkyManSkyMan Posts: 9,592 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>
    1921's were the best struck peace dollars. image >>



    Man, you must'a been chopping some of them up and snorting them at the disco. image They are NOTORIOUS for not being fully struck up.


  • << <i>

    << <i>
    1921's were the best struck peace dollars. image >>



    Man, you must'a been chopping some of them up and snorting them at the disco. image They are NOTORIOUS for not being fully struck up. >>


    I know my stuff. Sorry you don't.

    eom.
  • RWBRWB Posts: 8,082
    Most 1921 Peace dollars are not fully struck – the relief was too great when combined with the juxtaposition of high points of the obverse and reverse to fill the dies completely. The best struck pieces most likely come from the first 200,000 made on Dec 28. The dies were changed frequently and the mint tried to get good impressions. Many collectors dislike these pieces because the luster is soft and satin-like, not typical of the expected “cartwheel luster.”

    Even a fully struck 1921 will not show detail in the hair over Liberty’s ear – there wasn’t any detail there, and that was intentional. Some of the 1922s were well struck, but the dies were in low relief. This, combined with the broad, detail free expanses of the face and field, give the coins a flat, mushy look. Apparently, this is consistent with what de Francisci and James Fraser wanted since Fraser approved the low relief design on Feb 14, 1922.
  • zennyzenny Posts: 1,547 ✭✭


    << <i>I was going to say the opposite of everyone here, that it has a rather weak strike for a '21, a year with notoriously strong strikes.... >>




    So, let's see a couple, (or, since it's a year with Notoriously strong strikes), how about three, just three photos of notoriously strongly struck 1921 Peace dollars.


    thanks in advance, I'm looking forward to them.


    z
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1921's were the best struck peace dollars.

    basestealer, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, but in this case you may want to reconsider scoffing at the others who have tried to correct you. while 1921 Peace Dollars have an undeniable higher relief to the detail, they are typically not fully struck and have the look of the subject coin-----weak/non-existent hair detail above the ear which often gives a flat, worn look, and a corresponding flat area at the eagles leg where it joins the body/wing.

    with all that said, the coin looks like an MS63/64 and maybe not dipped out, just "blue" and washed out because of bad white balance.
  • goose3goose3 Posts: 11,471 ✭✭✭
    image

    Open mouth insert foot Basestealer....

    of course you're used to that by now.
  • goose3goose3 Posts: 11,471 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>
    1921's were the best struck peace dollars. image >>



    Man, you must'a been chopping some of them up and snorting them at the disco. image They are NOTORIOUS for not being fully struck up. >>


    I know my stuff. Sorry you don't.

    eom. >>




    now that's got to be quoted.


  • << <i>image

    Open mouth insert foot Basestealer....

    of course you're used to that by now. >>


    pig
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    basestealer, just admit that you kind of screwed the pooch on this one, i mean it's stupid to argue the point. it's unarguable.
  • dthigpendthigpen Posts: 3,932 ✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>
    1921's were the best struck peace dollars. image >>



    Man, you must'a been chopping some of them up and snorting them at the disco. image They are NOTORIOUS for not being fully struck up. >>


    I know my stuff. Sorry you don't.

    eom. >>




    This made me laugh out loud in real life.


  • << <i>

    << <i>image

    Open mouth insert foot Basestealer....

    of course you're used to that by now. >>


    pig >>



    image


  • << <i>image >>




    WOW!! There's some interesting reading in those search results !

    OWN3D !!

    image
  • goose3goose3 Posts: 11,471 ✭✭✭
    How'd you know?!image


  • << <i>How'd you know?!image >>



    image
  • FatManFatMan Posts: 8,977


    << <i>1921's were the best struck peace dollars. >>



    << <i>I know my stuff. Sorry you don't. >>

    Wow, to be so wrong and with such righteousness. Some of the people on this forum amaze me.
  • As an aside, you can see for yourselves (by searching past posts or googling those involved) that a small group of malevolent cyber-obsessed stalkers have taken their sights on me, having previously railroaded numerous others in much the same fashion. Their posts speak for themselves, so pardon my anger when responding further to any thread in which they've spawned.

    As for the 1921 peace dollar, it was the only year in which the coin was struck in high relief (twice, I believe). Following years the mint reduced the striking pressure and flattened the dies. We can argue over what "full strike" truly means, but my definition of it and the way I'm applying it here is that the 1921 peace dollars had better strikes, stronger strikes, and were struck as the original sculpter intended (contrary to what was posted here, the sculpter did not agree with the changes). Anyway, this isn't a contest. I couldn't care less if anyone's mind changes. It's just not that important.
  • DorkGirlDorkGirl Posts: 9,994 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>1921's were the best struck peace dollars. >>



    << <i>I know my stuff. Sorry you don't. >>

    Wow, to be so wrong and with such righteousness. Some of the people on this forum amaze me. >>



    You and me both.....
    Becky


  • << <i>As an aside, you can see for yourselves (by searching past posts or googling those involved) that a small group of malevolent cyber-obsessed stalkers have taken their sights on me, having previously railroaded numerous others in much the same fashion. Their posts speak for themselves, so pardon my anger when responding further to any thread in which they've spawned.

    As for the 1921 peace dollar, it was the only year in which the coin was struck in high relief (twice, I believe). Following years the mint reduced the striking pressure and flattened the dies. We can argue over what "full strike" truly means, but my definition of it and the way I'm applying it here is that the 1921 peace dollars had better strikes, stronger strikes, and were struck as the original sculpter intended (contrary to what was posted here, the sculpter did not agree with the changes). Anyway, this isn't a contest. I couldn't care less if anyone's mind changes. It's just not that important. >>



    It reads just like it should.

    image
  • DennisHDennisH Posts: 14,040 ✭✭✭✭✭
    From page 2758 of Q. David Bowers' "Silver Dollars and Trade Dollars of the United States":

    Nearly all known specimens are lightly struck on the hair at the center of the obverse and often at the center of the reverse as well. In fact, fewer than 10 1921 Peace dollars out of 1,000 are very sharply struck."

    I'm siding with Mr. Bowers on this one.
    When in doubt, don't.
  • sharp and strong, sharp and double struck, same thing=not same thing? The fact that they were struck twice, in high relief, is indisputable. The rest is a matter of symantics. Some people are focusing on hair detail, rather than depth of the strike, and not stating so.
  • The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary.

    Suggestions for symantics:

    1. semantics
    2. semiotics
    3. semantic
    4. simoniacs
    5. simmental
    6. semi-antique
    7. cementite
    8. cinematic
    9. cinematize
    10. synthetics
    NMFB ™

    image
  • semantics. Lucky I don't pour over the typos on this forum--you'd all be ashamed, and I wouldn't have a free day till 2034.
  • clarkbar04clarkbar04 Posts: 5,010 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Maybe you should write a book and set the numismatic world straight, once and for all.
    MS66 taste on an MS63 budget.


  • << <i>Maybe you should write a book and set the numismatic world straight, once and for all. >>


    Everything I've said here is already in every book that discusses peace dollars.

    Cheers!
  • It's not really an exercise in semantics in this context. Most of the terms used in numismatics have fairly specific meanings, including those related to strike.
    NMFB ™

    image
  • dthigpendthigpen Posts: 3,932 ✭✭
    basestealer,

    I think the sum of all of your actions on this board speaks for itself if anyone actually does a search as you suggested (just did), rather enlightening to those that normally wouldn't GAF.
  • coinmickeycoinmickey Posts: 767 ✭✭


    << <i>semantics. Lucky I don't pour over the typos on this forum--you'd all be ashamed, and I wouldn't have a free day till 2034. >>



    Make that 2035...

    "pore"

    image

    Great thread BTW...image
    Rufus T. Firefly: How would you like a job in the mint?

    Chicolini: Mint? No, no, I no like a mint. Uh - what other flavor you got?



    image


  • << <i>basestealer,

    I think the sum of all of your actions on this board speaks for itself if anyone actually does a search as you suggested (just did), rather enlightening to those that normally wouldn't GAF. >>


    The sum of my "actions"! LOL. Name an "action" you find unsuitable. Name one.
  • OmegaOmega Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭
    Back to the coin:

    MS63
    Not overdipped IMHO.

    basestealer:
    FR2
    Overdipped IMHO

    image

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file