Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Grade This 3 cent silver

Opinions please?

I know these pics aren't great, I'll post some better ones later...

image

image

Comments

  • Options
    BarndogBarndog Posts: 20,525 ✭✭✭✭✭
    no clue about these things. Is it really a bit darker or is the color true on the photos? How about somewhere around choice AU? Did I say I have no clue?
  • Options
    Ummmmmm cleaned XF.
    image
  • Options
    StrikeOutXXXStrikeOutXXX Posts: 3,354 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Hard to split hairs with the difference between "Trace of wear and lightly worn" with the pic, I'll assume there is no luster left and give it an XF.
    ------------------------------------------------------------

    "You Suck Award" - February, 2015

    Discoverer of 1919 Mercury Dime DDO - FS-101
  • Options
    STONESTONE Posts: 15,275
    I also hate grading these things. I'll go AU-50, but I haven't a clue.

    Nice coin though.
  • Options
    DHeathDHeath Posts: 8,472 ✭✭✭
    My guess is that the coin has a nice original patina, and there is only a TINY trace of wear on the diamond. Typical mushy strike obverse from a clashed die. The coins is strong AU. It could holder AU62 if it has luster not revealed in the images. JMO
    Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers
    and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
  • Options
    Cam40Cam40 Posts: 8,146
    shows no hint of luster so like it was dipped/stripped of any original surfaces
    once or twice?
  • Options
    ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,669 ✭✭✭
    These things are next to impossible to grade. Having said that, I'll WAG AU-50, likely messed with.
  • Options


    << <i>These things are next to impossible to grade. Having said that, I'll WAG AU-50, likely messed with. >>



    i 2nd that... about the best i could say not know this series too well either

    /ed

  • Options
    NumisOxideNumisOxide Posts: 11,044 ✭✭✭✭✭
    AU50

  • Options
    BigDaddyzBigDaddyz Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭
    I'll just say "I really like it"
    Great BST experiences: abitofthisabitofthat, silvercoinsdude, gerard, coinfame, mikescoins, wondercoin
  • Options
    Type2Type2 Posts: 13,985 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Needs a little dip I will go with MS62 type-1


    Hoard the keys.
  • Options
    that coin screams counterfeit, it just has that look. I doubt it is genuine
  • Options
    cmerlo1cmerlo1 Posts: 8,062 ✭✭✭✭✭
    EF-45...something doesn't look right, though. Cleaned, maybe?
    You Suck! Awarded 6/2008- 1901-O Micro O Morgan, 8/2008- 1878 VAM-123 Morgan, 9/2022 1888-O VAM-1B3 H8 Morgan | Senior Regional Representative- ANACS Coin Grading. Posted opinions on coins are my own, and are not an official ANACS opinion.
  • Options
    looks really nice to me.
    MS64
  • Options
    mcheathmcheath Posts: 2,441 ✭✭✭
    au55
  • Options
    itsnotjustmeitsnotjustme Posts: 8,788 ✭✭✭
    XF45 and probably cleaned.

    Give Blood (Red Bags) & Platelets (Yellow Bags)!
  • Options
    ChangeInHistoryChangeInHistory Posts: 3,119 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Cleaned AU-50
  • Options
    poorguypoorguy Posts: 4,317
    AU50. Strong detail but definite rub on the higher points and a flat, non-existant luster. Dull-Drab-lacking luster is very common on trimes even in MS grades. I can't be sure if it's been cleaned or not from the pics but I'm seeing some stuff on there that would have been removed by a recent cleaning so it appears to have at least toned over if it was cleaned in the past.
    Brandon Kelley - ANA - 972.746.9193 - http://www.bestofyesterdaycollectibles.com
  • Options
    jdimmickjdimmick Posts: 9,965 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Au-50-53

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file