Home U.S. Coin Forum
Options

Cool Sesquicentennial Half Dollar

I bought this Sesquicentennial half dollar at a jewelry store last week for silver melt. What do you think it would grade?
image

Comments

  • Options
    LeianaLeiana Posts: 4,349
    Po-01- basic coin type is identifiable.

    Actually, if you can't read the date it might not grade at all.

    But it's really super cool! Why put a grade on it? image

    -Amanda
    image

    I'm a YN working on a type set!

    My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!

    Proud member of the CUFYNA
  • Options
    Moose1913Moose1913 Posts: 401 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Actually, if you can't read the date it might not grade at all.

    -Amanda >>

    PO01. It doesn't need a visible date since it is a one year type.
    I pick things up
    I am a collector
    And things, well things
    They tend to accumulate
  • Options
    LeianaLeiana Posts: 4,349


    << <i>

    << <i>Actually, if you can't read the date it might not grade at all.

    -Amanda >>

    PO01. It doesn't need a visible date since it is a one year type. >>



    Yeah, I know it's a one year type. I am just not sure about the grading rules with regards to a legible date.

    -Amanda
    image

    I'm a YN working on a type set!

    My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!

    Proud member of the CUFYNA
  • Options
    Moose1913Moose1913 Posts: 401 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>Actually, if you can't read the date it might not grade at all.

    -Amanda >>

    PO01. It doesn't need a visible date since it is a one year type. >>

    Yeah, I know it's a one year type. I am just not sure about the grading rules with regards to a legible date.

    -Amanda >>

    I know you know, but others don't. image

    If he's going with PCGS it won't need a visible date. A prime example of this is the Chain Cent.
    I pick things up
    I am a collector
    And things, well things
    They tend to accumulate
  • Options
    LeianaLeiana Posts: 4,349


    << <i>I know you know, but others don't. image

    If he's going with PCGS it won't need a visible date. A prime example of this is the Chain Cent. >>



    Ah, okay. That makes sense. image

    Thanks for clearing that up!

    -Amanda
    image

    I'm a YN working on a type set!

    My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!

    Proud member of the CUFYNA
  • Options
    BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,486 ✭✭✭✭✭
    It's a good, solid Poor-1 and choice for the grade. image

    Congrats! It's a major rarity in that grade.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • Options
    BB for cleaning? Looks unnaturally bright
  • Options
    JulioJulio Posts: 2,501
    OK. I just learned something. Cool. jws
    image
  • Options
    great pocket piece! I love it.
  • Options
    robertprrobertpr Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭


    << <i>

    << <i>

    << <i>Actually, if you can't read the date it might not grade at all.

    -Amanda >>

    PO01. It doesn't need a visible date since it is a one year type. >>



    Yeah, I know it's a one year type. I am just not sure about the grading rules with regards to a legible date.

    -Amanda >>



    The rules are that you must be able to determine the date, not necessarily read it. One year types and coins with identifying die characteristics, for instance, are gradeable as PO01 even without a readable date, AS LONG AS the date/mintmark can be determined.
  • Options
    I have this exact same coin, but its at least an AU58, actually i know its better than that but just to be safe lets say thats the grade. About how much would it be worth then?
  • Options
    savoyspecialsavoyspecial Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭
    >>I have this exact same coin, but its at least an AU58....>>



    so, let me get this straight, at least 57 Sheldon points separate the two coins??? if this is the case, they are NOTHING alike

    www.brunkauctions.com

  • Options
    savoyspecialsavoyspecial Posts: 7,268 ✭✭✭✭
    addendum: if you are new to the lowball phenomenon, be advised that the coin shown in the original post of this thread would bring more $$ than an AU58

    www.brunkauctions.com

  • Options
    How's that?
  • Options
    DorkGirlDorkGirl Posts: 9,994 ✭✭✭


    << <i>How's that? >>



    Because it is almost impossible to find a PO1, but there are lots of AU58s.
    Becky
  • Options
    JamesMurrayJamesMurray Posts: 4,036
    I struggle to believe that wear is a natural occurance , sure we all know a coin will wear but that one..dunno.I think it had help.
  • Options
    DorkGirlDorkGirl Posts: 9,994 ✭✭✭


    << <i>I struggle to believe that wear is a natural occurance , sure we all know a coin will wear but that one..dunno.I think it had help. >>



    It was a pocket piece. Someone carried it around a lot of years. I once saw a pocket piece Morgan at a coin show. It belonged to a dealer. He had carried it since WWII. It was a blank, he had worn it smooth.
    Becky
  • Options
    JamesMurrayJamesMurray Posts: 4,036
    Fair dues DG , i just find it difficult to believe.My Father carried a $20 gold piece in his pocket for as long as i can remember and i'm no spring chicken,gold being softer,yet it didnt wear to anything remotely smooth.
  • Options
    ZoinsZoins Posts: 33,911 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The lack of letters without having virtually flat fields and rims makes this coin look very neat.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file