Grade this 1885-CC PCGS Graded Morgan.

TorinoCobra71 · September 15, 2006 6:00AM

TorinoCobra71

wam98 · September 15, 2006 6:03AM

I like the coin as an MS-63. Nice 85 CC.

guitarwes · September 15, 2006 6:05AM

nice die cracks!!! oh yeah 63/64

richardshipp · September 15, 2006 6:06AM

Ok, remember I'm just learning but....

I'd say MS 65 although wouldn't be surprised if its a 64. The coin has some areas that are really, really, nice and others that took some hits. Overall its very pretty.

It looks like in the picture that theres some nice die cracks going on too.

marmac · September 15, 2006 6:08AM

63

StrikeOutXXX · September 15, 2006 6:12AM

MS-63 with some nice cracks.

Is that a VAM 3 tilted left CC? I don't think PCGS recognizes that one, but the 2nd "C" looks pretty high.

VamGuy · September 15, 2006 6:12AM

64

TorinoCobra71 · September 15, 2006 6:13AM

<< <i>MS-63 with some nice cracks.

Is that a VAM 3 tilted left CC? I don't think PCGS recognizes that one, but the 2nd "C" looks pretty high. >>

Sorry, I am not a VAM person/collector so I could not tell ya. Any VAM experts here that can help out?

TorinoCobra71

Dog97 · September 15, 2006 6:16AM

I'd say 63 @ first glance but I don't think the facial ticks are severe so I'll go 64.
Since it's an 85 the insert might say 65.

123cents · September 15, 2006 6:24AM

I'll guess MS-63.

DennisH · September 15, 2006 6:42AM

MS63

kwmorgan · September 15, 2006 7:12AM

I'd say 63

Crazy4Coins · September 15, 2006 7:22AM

Cheek looks a little baggy to me....the reverse is a nice 64. Probably a 63.....but it could be as 62.

Connecticoin · September 15, 2006 7:25AM

63

DorkGirl · September 15, 2006 8:33AM

Very interesting spot for a greased filled die. First time I've ever seen a "No wheat stalk" Morgan.

richardshipp · September 17, 2006 6:02AM

So what was the grade?

MrSpud · September 17, 2006 6:06AM

62

Lambeau · September 17, 2006 6:07AM

Sweet die cracks! MS-64

clw54 · September 17, 2006 6:09AM

64

HighRelief · September 17, 2006 7:07AM

Looks like it could go MS64 from the pictures

Whizzard · September 17, 2006 7:18AM

The rim ding and diffuse noise on the front should hold it to 64.

Steve27 · September 17, 2006 7:23AM

I was going to say 64, but that weak strike forces me to say 63.

TwoSides2aCoin · September 17, 2006 7:29AM

I don't want to insult anyone, but it looks MS62 to me.

TorinoCobra71 · September 17, 2006 9:00AM

<< <i>So what was the grade? >>

TorinoCobra71

Dog97 · September 17, 2006 11:50AM

63?? Man you got jipped! That was graded in 1998 and IMO they were tough on Morgs then.

GoldenEyeNumismatics · September 17, 2006 12:50PM

64

ziggy29 · September 17, 2006 12:51PM

I think it's a 63/64 liner, except that the cheek is too baggy so I'd probably say 63.

richardshipp · September 18, 2006 2:37AM

Well, its a nice 63. Thanks.

BillJones · September 18, 2006 2:40AM

Because it is a CC dollar, it had a better chance of getting an MS-64, and than a coin from the other mints. There are CC dollars out there in 64 holder that are no better or not even as good as this piece. When I saw the picture I figured that could be in either a 63 or 64 holder.

morgannut2 · September 18, 2006 4:04AM

Jones has it===

---Depends too on the luster in hand; hard to tell online if it 64's next time.

AlixTCat · September 18, 2006 5:43AM

Without looking further in the thread... I'll say MS65. The coin is very nice, but has some hits on the cheek that I think make it around 65.

Jonathan

AlixTCat · September 18, 2006 5:45AM

<< <i>Very interesting spot for a greased filled die. First time I've ever seen a "No wheat stalk" Morgan.

>>

I think you are seeing something on the holder, not the coin.

Jonathan

dragon · September 18, 2006 5:51AM

Probably would've gone a point higher if not for the weak spot on the obverse above LIBERTY.

09sVDB · September 18, 2006 6:14AM

MS63

Grade this 1885-CC PCGS Graded Morgan.

Comments

Leave a Comment