Yup! It's one of my favorite series to collect. This 1867-S is a recent pickup. The coin is bent and would receive a details grade which I don't mind, I was thrilled to find an example of the date.
Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you. https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.
I responded to the post "Do You Collect Half Dimes" but I didn't realize that my "copy/post" efforts from my Heritage Coin Inventory made it on here. I apologize for not deleting the unnecessary details that Heritate includes in their online inventory option that I use. I am editing now. Anyway, here is the edited version of my half-dime section in my U.S. type set. I see that I neglected to include an LM number for the 1795 so when I have a chance to hit the bank, I'll see if I can figure it out (again) and notate the number. I guess I got too excited about the R-6 part!
@The_Dinosaur_Man said:
Yup! It's one of my favorite series to collect. This 1867-S is a recent pickup. The coin is bent and would receive a details grade which I don't mind, I was thrilled to find an example of the date.
Your 67-S looks a lot like mine! This is my only half dime of the 1863-67 stretch:
"You can't get just one gun." "You can't get just one tattoo." "You can't get just one 1796 Draped Bust Large Cent."
@oih82w8 said:
Yes, I collect half dimes, among other U.S. Type coinage.
Nice '49/6. When I saw you posted it I immediately recognized the similar toning I have on my '48 medium date, turns out they are likely from the same former set, three serial numbers apart. This coin looks quite good in hand.
Thanks, I don’t think it is the V1 high date, [...]
I agree with @Mr_Spud - the V-1 high date overlaps the base (see above).
1854 Philadelphia is probably the most difficult seated half dime date to attribute by die pair.
All the obverses except the V-1 have the same date and arrows position, as they were on the hub.
And there is no mint mark position.
Many of the 1854 coins are clashed, but the clash positions are somewhat similar, and the mintage is fairly high.
I have identified about 17 die pairs so far.
Comments
Yup! It's one of my favorite series to collect. This 1867-S is a recent pickup. The coin is bent and would receive a details grade which I don't mind, I was thrilled to find an example of the date.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e3ce/8e3ce2fb13fea9a4295af138f1bd2a744da29617" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e422/6e42211fdf8f5e506bfa47e944ed71068992b4fb" alt=""
Custom album maker and numismatic photographer.
Need a personalized album made? Design it on the website below and I'll build it for you.
https://www.donahuenumismatics.com/.
Hello, everyone.
I responded to the post "Do You Collect Half Dimes" but I didn't realize that my "copy/post" efforts from my Heritage Coin Inventory made it on here. I apologize for not deleting the unnecessary details that Heritate includes in their online inventory option that I use. I am editing now. Anyway, here is the edited version of my half-dime section in my U.S. type set. I see that I neglected to include an LM number for the 1795 so when I have a chance to hit the bank, I'll see if I can figure it out (again) and notate the number. I guess I got too excited about the R-6 part!data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a53b0/a53b01cf12072e7d21a5330f3ad3bea87652937b" alt=":p :p"
1795 H10C LM- Rarity 6 VG Details, "Damaged" NGC
1800 H10C VG10 PCGS
1834 H10C 3/Inverted XF45 ANACS
1837 H10C Small Date VF35 PCGS
1844 H10C AU55 PCGS
1854 H10C ARROWS AU53 PCGS
1861 H10C MS64 SEGS
Piano1
Only for type. Seated Liberty is my favorite.
Only as part of my 7070 Type Set... here's one...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fa87/2fa8784ff047d2a8d22f9bf3e67ba0f70a1e6db8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e24d0/e24d05fed061670c15ed003cbfddcf0523c8f4c7" alt=""
Successful BST transactions with: SilverEagles92; Ahrensdad; Smitty; GregHansen; Lablade; Mercury10c; copperflopper; whatsup; KISHU1; scrapman1077, crispy, canadanz, smallchange, robkool, Mission16, ranshdow, ibzman350, Fallguy, Collectorcoins, SurfinxHI, jwitten, Walkerguy21D, dsessom.
Your 67-S looks a lot like mine! This is my only half dime of the 1863-67 stretch:
"You can't get just one gun." "You can't get just one tattoo." "You can't get just one 1796 Draped Bust Large Cent."
Yep the clashing on the '54 is spectacular. Is that the V1 high date?
Yes, I collect half dimes, among other U.S. Type coinage.
BST transactions: dbldie55, jayPem, 78saen, UltraHighRelief, nibanny, liefgold, FallGuy, lkeigwin, mbogoman, Sandman70gt, keets, joeykoins, ianrussell (@GC), EagleEye, ThePennyLady, GRANDAM, Ilikecolor, Gluggo, okiedude, Voyageur, LJenkins11, fastfreddie, ms70, pursuitofliberty, ZoidMeister,Coin Finder, GotTheBug, edwardjulio, Coinnmore, Nickpatton, Namvet69,...
Thanks, I don’t think it is the V1 high date, here’s a magnified image
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97688/976887f47569ee558f6d49c43fd716cce18582ac" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bee28/bee28a436c2696c16553ffc12750c3ca94437e86" alt=""
Mr_Spud
Nice '49/6. When I saw you posted it I immediately recognized the similar toning I have on my '48 medium date, turns out they are likely from the same former set, three serial numbers apart. This coin looks quite good in hand.
@fathom wrote:
@Mr_Spud wrote:
I agree with @Mr_Spud - the V-1 high date overlaps the base (see above).
1854 Philadelphia is probably the most difficult seated half dime date to attribute by die pair.
All the obverses except the V-1 have the same date and arrows position, as they were on the hub.
And there is no mint mark position.
Many of the 1854 coins are clashed, but the clash positions are somewhat similar, and the mintage is fairly high.
I have identified about 17 die pairs so far.