<<Is this shilling? Or is there another explanation?>>
Another explanation: Two bidders bid more than once on the coin. The under-bidder bought a coin from another seller and very well might be perfectly legitimate. The high bidder has been involved in other coin transactions with people other than the seller and might also be perfectly legitimate.
If it's shilling, it's not very well done. Nor is it a good way to win the coin at the lowest price possible. It never ceases to amaze me that people think it's a good idea to run the price up long before the bidding closes.
I don't think it's a shill. More likely it's an eBay user who doesn't fully understand proxy bidding. He's just bidding to the next highest bid until he becomes the high bidder.
It's interesting however, that he hasn't won an eBay auction in nearly 6 years!!!
you might be on to something . "jtwxw0j6n" has also run up the bidding on all the of his regular auctions . I did an advanced search and the only items this guy is bidding on are these three !
co-inky-dink?................
Dan
Fishing is not a matter of life and death.......It's much more important than that........
Comments
-Amanda
I'm a YN working on a type set!
My Buffalo Nickel Website Home of the Quirky Buffaloes Collection!
Proud member of the CUFYNA
Another explanation: Two bidders bid more than once on the coin. The under-bidder bought a coin from another seller and very well might be perfectly legitimate. The high bidder has been involved in other coin transactions with people other than the seller and might also be perfectly legitimate.
Also, kind of strange that the high bidder hasn't completed a transaction in 6 years.
It's interesting however, that he hasn't won an eBay auction in nearly 6 years!!!
<< <i> Maybe he just got out of prison >>
Maybe it's Brett Bogus.
you might be on to something . "jtwxw0j6n" has also run up the bidding on all the of
his regular auctions . I did an advanced search and the only items this guy is bidding on
are these three !
co-inky-dink?................
Dan
<< <i>Is this shilling? Or is there another explanation? >>
It looks like a US three cent piece rather than a British coin. So no, I would say it isn't a shilling. Shillings were bigger- more quarter-sized.