Home U.S. Coin Forum

what % of ngc graded coins within an ngc registry set is required..

to be considered for an NGC registry award?
USPI minimalist design collage
image
designset
Treasury Seals Type Set

Comments

  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,960 ✭✭✭
    I have gotten 4 NGC registry awards with 100% PCGS coins listed. I don't think it matters who's holder it is in they only care about the coin. image
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,782 ✭✭✭✭

    0% still works.
    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • RussRuss Posts: 48,514 ✭✭✭
    TDN did an analysis of this a while back and I believe he found some indications of bias in the awards.

    Russ, NCNE
  • USPI minimalist design collage
    image
    designset
    Treasury Seals Type Set
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,121 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The main bias is that you have to be a zillionair to win any award for the #1 set either there or at the PCGS site.

    You have to buy a bunch extremely expensive, very common coins with high grades on them to get anywhere.

    When it comes to registry awards, high grades are most important. Rarity comes in second.

    And yea, the answer to the question is ZERO. You don't need any NGC coins.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • ZERO !

    But dont get me started !

    i do believe it does not have to be the number 1 set in a given series.

    Nice pictures and descriptions count for a lot and the set must be complete by mid December

    I hope i am considered this year !
    image
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,121 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Nice pictures and descriptions count for a lot and the set must be complete by mid December >>



    The only award that I'm aware of that gives credit to pictures and descriptions in the "best presented" award. I won that one last year for my early half dime set.

    Otherwise, the only thing that counts is the total number of points you have. There are a whole bunch of award winning sets that have NO PICTURES and and NO DESCRIPTIONS. That totally sucks IMO.

    I've challenged a few these guys who always win but have not pictures. One response I got was, "pictures are expensive!" Give me a break! You have a collection is worth hundreds of thousands of dollars in some cases, and you can't afford a camera that costs a few hundred bucks? And what kind of collector is it who has NOTHING to say about the coins in their collection.

    There should be a reduction in points for those who post no pictures and no descriptions. They don't deserve anything IMO.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • tradedollarnuttradedollarnut Posts: 20,162 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>TDN did an analysis of this a while back and I believe he found some indications of bias in the awards.

    Russ, NCNE >>



    I have won a 'Best Presented Set' award with almost all PCGS coins. However, if you want to win a 'Best Set' award, you'd best have 50% or more NGC.


    Otherwise, the only thing that counts is the total number of points you have.

    Actually, in my analysis, it wasn't the total number of points in the set that corresponded to a Best Set award, but rather the average points per coin. I ranked the top sets in this manner and then put a mark by those that were half or more NGC. The sets awarded corresponded 100% to those on the list with a mark. But it's not a rule written anywhere... image
  • BECOKABECOKA Posts: 16,960 ✭✭✭


    << <i>The main bias is that you have to be a zillionair to win any award for the #1 set either there or at the PCGS site.

    You have to buy a bunch extremely expensive, very common coins with high grades on them to get anywhere.

    When it comes to registry awards, high grades are most important. Rarity comes in second.

    And yea, the answer to the question is ZERO. You don't need any NGC coins. >>



    No, you just have to pick a subset that no one has signed up for. In my case I have a small set of eagles that would never win any awards. At NGC they not only have a complete set but a sub date set which only had one person.

    To make a long story short you only have to be a zillionair for the big sets.
  • but what of the signature sets?
    USPI minimalist design collage
    image
    designset
    Treasury Seals Type Set

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file