POLL: WHEN and HOW WAS MODERN COLLECTING REALLY BORN????????
oreville
Posts: 12,030 ✭✭✭✭✭
Hopefully this will bring a humorous but possibly accurate perspective into the whole history of when and how "modern collecting" was born?
A Collectors Universe poster since 1997!
0
Comments
So shouldn't 6th century BC be the correct answer?
My Web Sites
Russ, NCNE
<< <i>So shouldn't 6th century BC be the correct answer? >>
If you come across a coin dated 600 b.c. be very suspicious
Have fun!
George Washington would probably have said 1776 with the Continental Dollars.
I was born in '52 . I've always felt that when the mint switched to "Clad " coinage in 65' is when "Modern" coinage began,at least in my opinion.With that respect, Modern Collecting did'nt really start until early 80's.People did'nt think that this new clad junk was worth collecting due to the vast numbers produced and with no siver in them.So few people set any aside and just spent them.Now they are worth some money in high grades. Modern Commemoratives are classified as beginning in 1982.Interesting question,thanks for bringing it up.I would like to see how others here view this also.
1997 Matte Nickel strike thru U
"Error Collector- I Love Dem Crazy Coins"
"Money, what is money? It is loaned to a man; he comes into the world with nothing and he leaves with nothing." Billy Durant. Founder of General Motors. He died a pauper.
Richard S. Yeoman tried to tell everyone in the '60's that they were missing a bet and that these coins would one day be scarce.
I started collecting them in 1972 when I read a space filler in the Chicago Tribune that said the mint and FED were switching to FIFO accounting and would begin rotating their coin stocks. I had been watching the coins from the beginning but saw no point in saving them for speculation because the FED was always releasing old clads which would destroy a market if it existed. I immediately began seeking the finest coins for "investment" but fell for their charms and became a real collector by the late '70's. I started promoting them in '86 and specializing in '96.
Larry
Dabigkahuna
I've thought about this. Would any of you consider a Standing Liberty quarter "modern"?
What about a Mercury dime?
What about any 10 cent and up coin before 1965? They WERE 90 percent silver.
Or are you of the pre-1900 crowd?
Anything and everything coinwise is collectable, and stands on it's own merits for what it is.
This "modern crap" stuff should stop, at least in a derisive nature.
Personally, I consider any post-1964 minted coin "modern". Collect what you want or are fascinated with.
It's a HOBBY, damn it.
There. I said it.
Pete
<< <i>This "modern crap" stuff should stop, at least in a derisive nature. >>
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
President, Racine Numismatic Society 2013-2014; Variety Resource Dimes; See 6/8/12 CDN for my article on Winged Liberty Dimes; Ebay
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value---zero."----Voltaire
"Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."----Voltaire
Tbig
rainbowroosie April 1, 2003
<< <i>I wasn't sure so I asked one of my collecting friends and he says sometime after the medieval period when common, junk, milled coinage (like Trade Dollars and State Quarters for example) began to be produced in mass quantity. >>
I just talked to another of my collecting friends and he says that my first friend is totally wrong. This friend says modern coins begin exaclty one year after the series that he collects ended.
My Web Sites
Modern coins have been around for centuries, but Classics didn't come until 1955, the year I was born
I would have voted it started last Tuesday, but didn't see it as an option
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
<< <i>I would have voted it started last Tuesday, but didn't see it as an option >>
ROFL
Perhaps there is no answer... I think there are afew that make sense and the one I am about to suggest makes some sense, but not from a numismatic perspective...
I will say the modern era starts in 1945 with the ending of WW II.
Why?
Maybe because the world changed and so did coinage that year and shortly thereafter... the last true circulating classic designs left by 1948 with the introduction of the Franklin Half.
The design aspect is not the driving force, but the rise in lesure time and the fact that more people/collectors could think about coins in a different light... even the Red Book was first issued and made its appearance in late 1946.
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
<< <i>Unfortunately Monty, last Tuesady was not an option...
Perhaps there is no answer... I think there are afew that make sense and the one I am about to suggest makes some sense, but not from a numismatic perspective...
I will say the modern era starts in 1945 with the ending of WW II. Why?
Maybe because the world changed and so did coinage that year and shortly thereafter... the last true circulating classic designs left by 1948 with the introduction of the Franklin Half.
The design aspect is not the driving force, but the rise in lesure time and the fact that more people/collectors could think about coins in a different light... even the Red Book was first issued and made its appearance in late 1946. >>
For world coinage I often use 1950 but many of the changes in many countries
did start in 1945. All the axis powers had dramatic changes after the war and
even in the allied countries there were many which discontinued silver coinage
after 1945 or shortly later.
The US was one of the last countrie to abandon silver. Only Canada and Japan
were still using it extensively and essentially unchanged when we threw in the
towel.
As of this moment, a total of 45 votes for events in 1964/65 timeframe. Overwhelming number of votes verifying that U.S coinage went through a major transformation during that period giving birth to what many now consider 'modern' U.S coinage.
Probably depends on the age groups. In general, those born in the fifties, I bet are in the 1955 group. I think this age group represents the largest group of collectors, if separated by decade. There was a post asking ages some time back, and think this was the case.
The '64/'65 votes probably are not so "born-on-date" oriented, but more likely this seems logical due to the metal changes. The '64/'65 would be my second choice, but I was born in the fifties. (I'll do a search for that "age" question.)