Grade This Carson City Morgan -big pics-

dragon · December 15, 2005 2:25AM

tjkillian · December 15, 2005 2:29AM

A high-end MS-66 or a just made it MS-67. A really nice coin. Is it yours?

Tom

Coxe · December 15, 2005 2:31AM

I'd say PCGS would have given it an MS66. Clashed with attractive toning, but I am not crazy at all about the strike.

TheRaven · December 15, 2005 2:32AM

Is that crap on the holder on the reverse?

Darin · December 15, 2005 2:33AM

I'll guess 66 PL.

I love color like that on the obverse, its very attractive but doesn't dominate the coin.

wam98 · December 15, 2005 2:34AM

67. Very nice looker and a little clashing to go along.

Agflyer · December 15, 2005 2:35AM

Nice luster, so so strike, few hits. I'd call it a PQ 65.

dragon · December 15, 2005 2:37AM

<< <i>A high-end MS-66 or a just made it MS-67. A really nice coin. Is it yours?

Tom >>

just as soon as I can scrape up the money to pay the auction invoice.......

BlindedByEgo · December 15, 2005 2:42AM

66

jayboxx · December 15, 2005 2:45AM

66

Coinhusker1 · December 15, 2005 3:54AM

I'll guess a PQ MS65. The strike and hit on the eagles breast keeps it from 66.

TorinoCobra71 · December 15, 2005 4:04AM

<< <i>Nice luster, so so strike, few hits. I'd call it a PQ 65. >>

What they said......High End 65!

TorinoCobra71

Bochiman · December 15, 2005 4:12AM

I think it made the MS66 holder.

mgoodm3 · December 15, 2005 4:25AM

66

DennisH · December 15, 2005 4:54AM

MS67

tradedollarnut · December 15, 2005 4:59AM

A very very high end 66.

Numismanic · December 15, 2005 4:59AM

MS67

Barry · December 15, 2005 5:00AM

66

ddbird · December 15, 2005 5:16AM

66

19Lyds · December 15, 2005 5:23AM

I'm with him -------->

ibzman350 · December 15, 2005 6:09AM

Nice coin, I like..

66 works for me.

Herb

anablep · December 15, 2005 7:44AM

66

ultradmpldollars · December 15, 2005 7:51AM

I'm gonna say 66.

I'd be leery about the scrape below the eye.

Heritage's photos are a bit deceptive when it comes to seeing marks like those.

Bunker · December 15, 2005 7:52AM

66

Elcontador · December 15, 2005 8:12AM

The exceptionally clean cheek I think will get this coin in a 6 holder. No way is it a 7, and the weak strike, dip residue on the reverse, wing friction, etc., won't downgrade it to a 5. Most 5s of this date are not attractive coins. This coin is far nicer than 5s I've seen.