I would have to see both coins, but I would lean more towards the proof 64 that hasnt been messed with.
My daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 2 (2003). My son was diagnosed with Type 1 when he was 17 on December 31, 2009. We were stunned that another child of ours had been diagnosed. Please, if you don't have a favorite charity, consider giving to the JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation)
Most likely I'd prefer the original coin...but I wouldn't make the final decision until I saw the coins. Some dipped coins are considerably better and less "stripped" than others, and some "original" coins can have unattractive toning.
Comments
My daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at the age of 2 (2003). My son was diagnosed with Type 1 when he was 17 on December 31, 2009. We were stunned that another child of ours had been diagnosed. Please, if you don't have a favorite charity, consider giving to the JDRF (Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation)
JDRF Donation
WS
<< <i>I'd take the original, lower graded coin without the slightest hesitation. >>
without a doubt.
<< <i>I'd take the original, lower graded coin without the slightest hesitation. >>
No question, this.
Check out my current listings: https://ebay.com/sch/khunt/m.html?_ipg=200&_sop=12&_rdc=1
I just love the near uncirculated ones, especially the 1856 issue.
For those that don't know what my choice is you will find my answer in my sig line.
So who is buying all those dipped coins ?????
I guess Laura is buying them ?????
LMS
roadrunner
I've always said that a man you can dip with is a man you can reason with.
proof copper nickel cents if done correctly lend well to dipping IF it is the right coin with the right look and again done correctly