I'm not sure if it's CSA or KSA that is the legitimate Canadian grading company, however, I believe it is KSA. CSA is likely a bogus basement operation and there's a high possibility the card is altered/trimmed and won't cross, especially since it's graded as a supposed 10. Post a pic and we'll be able to give you a better opinion.
The following is only a test, in the event of a real emergency.....
"PSA/DNA are the experts, not us. We should take their word on such matters and realize a psa 10 will always overshadow a 10 of any competing company. They do this for a living and we should not question their professional opinion and realize a psa 10 is the uber-card every other grading company dreams of becoming..."
Actually, I would avoid other grading companies altogether. If you want a PSA 10, why take a chance with cards from other grading companies who will leave you with trimmed and altered cards when you can just get the card you want from PSA?
Why rummage around a dumpster and eat garbage when you can have fine dining in a top quality restaurant like the Olive Garden??
CSA is a "franchise" off-shoot of ASA - of Hager fame.
Back in the early 90s, Hager was selling franchises of his company - offering the rights to the arrow-head holder use and provided sonic equipment and training.
So the company had a "legitimate" start of sorts and now? Probably about as good as Gem and Pro?
If there are people here who have never heard of Alan Hager...they're missing out on a real treat!
1. The Old Days - Red & White flip (very similar to PSA's) - Good grading/authentication - overgraded by about 1 point relative to PSA (i.e. CSA 8 = PSA 7)
2. The Middle Period - Oversized blue holders with set/year stamped on holder - OK grading/authentication - overgraded by about 2 points relative to PSA (i.e. CSA 8 = PSA 6)
3. The Modern Period - Clear holders with subgrades - Laughable grading/authentication - basically PRO style rules on trimming and authenticity. Who cares about the grades when it is likely trimmed?
I've crossed a few older CSA cards (ones with flips that look like PSA's) with no problem at all. I would expect to get knocked down a grade or two, but I havent had any come back trimmed or grossly overgraded. That said, I've only done that with three cards.
There is an old 1979 Topps Ozzie Smith RC in a PSA 9 holder right now that I crossed over 5 years ago from a CSA 9 holder. I sold the card over 4 years ago. Mentioned only because many have said that CSA 9 don't cross equally.
I've sent cards to CSA some 5-6 years ago, overall they seemed close to, perhaps a bit "easier" than PSA, maybe a half to a full point higher. However I had two cards come back as not graded; evid. of alteration/trim, a 71 Catfish Hunter and a 82 Fleer ripken RC, both obtained raw from ebay sellers, though the Ripken was part of a complete set so unlikely to be trimmed, but shows not all non-major graders are charlatans.
I knew they moved to NY, but thought they closed up shop. Anyone have a link to their current website ??
This aint no party,... this aint no disco,.. this aint no fooling around.
All my old CSA cards were cracked out and sent to PSA (maybe 7 or so) all but one came back a grade higher. I was pleasantly shocked, some were $300+ cards.
I thought CSA was one of the first grading companies out there. I remember way back in the day when it was them, PSA, and SGC. I want to say this was around 1996 or so........
<< <i> have said time and time again CSA is just ahead of GAI >>
oh oh....i think a little PSA loyalty blinded you when you wrote this. CSA isnt horrible and i would buy their cards over PRO,GEM, KSA et al in a heartbeat...but i wouldnt compare them to GAI. Maybe if you said SCD instead...
<< <i> have said time and time again CSA is just ahead of GAI >>
oh oh....i think a little PSA loyalty blinded you when you wrote this. CSA isnt horrible and i would buy their cards over PRO,GEM, KSA et al in a heartbeat...but i wouldnt compare them to GAI. Maybe if you said SCD instead... >>
SCD with the red circle is legitimate. SCD with the blue circle is questionable.
<< <i> have said time and time again CSA is just ahead of GAI >>
oh oh....i think a little PSA loyalty blinded you when you wrote this. CSA isnt horrible and i would buy their cards over PRO,GEM, KSA et al in a heartbeat...but i wouldnt compare them to GAI. Maybe if you said SCD instead... >>
SCD with the red circle is legitimate. SCD with the blue circle is questionable. >>
Wrong, I do believe that most of the high dollar/ High grade GAI cards are seriously compromised.
Comments
"PSA/DNA are the experts, not us. We should take their word on such matters and realize a psa 10 will always overshadow a 10 of any competing company. They do this for a living and we should not question their professional opinion and realize a psa 10 is the uber-card every other grading company dreams of becoming..."
muhahahah
Julen
RIP GURU
You dabighurt in disguise?
Late 60's and early to mid 70's non-sports
Why rummage around a dumpster and eat garbage when you can have fine dining in a top quality restaurant like the Olive Garden??
GO MARLINS! Home of the best fans in baseball!!
Back in the early 90s, Hager was selling franchises of his company - offering the rights to the arrow-head
holder use and provided sonic equipment and training.
So the company had a "legitimate" start of sorts and now? Probably about as good as Gem and Pro?
If there are people here who have never heard of Alan Hager...they're missing out on a real treat!
mike
CSA seems to have had three distinct periods:
1. The Old Days - Red & White flip (very similar to PSA's) - Good grading/authentication - overgraded by about 1 point relative to PSA (i.e. CSA 8 = PSA 7)
2. The Middle Period - Oversized blue holders with set/year stamped on holder - OK grading/authentication - overgraded by about 2 points relative to PSA (i.e. CSA 8 = PSA 6)
3. The Modern Period - Clear holders with subgrades - Laughable grading/authentication - basically PRO style rules on trimming and authenticity. Who cares about the grades when it is likely trimmed?
Hope it helps.
Bosox1976
Ledsters
However I had two cards come back as not graded; evid. of alteration/trim, a 71 Catfish Hunter and a 82 Fleer ripken RC, both obtained raw from ebay sellers, though the Ripken was part of a complete set so unlikely to be trimmed, but shows not all non-major graders are charlatans.
I knew they moved to NY, but thought they closed up shop. Anyone have a link to their current website ??
<< <i>Olive Garden . . . Fine Restaurant . . . Somebodys Lost
I gotta say...I've had worse.
mike
post 1
post 2
post 3
post 4
post 5
and so on and so on
CSA Site
Old website, I believe, states that they are in NY.
Stingray
<< <i> have said time and time again CSA is just ahead of GAI >>
oh oh....i think a little PSA loyalty blinded you when you wrote this. CSA isnt horrible and i would buy their cards over PRO,GEM, KSA et al in a heartbeat...but i wouldnt compare them to GAI. Maybe if you said SCD instead...
<< <i>
<< <i> have said time and time again CSA is just ahead of GAI >>
oh oh....i think a little PSA loyalty blinded you when you wrote this. CSA isnt horrible and i would buy their cards over PRO,GEM, KSA et al in a heartbeat...but i wouldnt compare them to GAI. Maybe if you said SCD instead... >>
SCD with the red circle is legitimate. SCD with the blue circle is questionable.
The prior link is from April 2002, states they are near Columbus OH. and use a NY PO BOX for shipping .
CSA 9
Stingray
<< <i>
<< <i>
<< <i> have said time and time again CSA is just ahead of GAI >>
oh oh....i think a little PSA loyalty blinded you when you wrote this. CSA isnt horrible and i would buy their cards over PRO,GEM, KSA et al in a heartbeat...but i wouldnt compare them to GAI. Maybe if you said SCD instead... >>
SCD with the red circle is legitimate. SCD with the blue circle is questionable. >>
Wrong, I do believe that most of the high dollar/ High grade GAI cards are seriously compromised.