What you think on this Morgan?

Numismatics

What you think on the grade?
Is the toning NT or AT?

Thanks.

ozzysdad

I say NT, and MS-65????

coinbuf

NT and the grade is MS64, the luster looks good and no big hits but the hair over the ear is just a touch too weak to go 65 at PCGS IMO.

Chris

Edited to add: A nice lite clash marks too.

Numismatics

Thanks for the inputs.
Any other opinions?

WTCG

Natural toning, MS64.

BlindedByEgo

I would buy the coin as a natural MS64 all day. I agree with the strike weakness keeping it from a 65, but to hedge my bet it could still have a shot.

Pretty coin in any event.

DennisH

100% original.

Looks PQ MS63 to me; those light scuffs on the chin and cheekbone areas are fairly distracting.

pharmer

NT 65, nice

Myqqy

I would say NT, and the grade would be around a 64......

sellsatan

The colors look right to me and they fully embrace the devices. A nice naturally toned Morgan that looks like a solid 64 to me.

Steve27

Definately NT and looks to be at least a 65 if not a 66.

DenverDave

MS65 / NT...

fivecents

MS64/NT

VamGuy

MS65
NT

tjkillian

MS-65 and NT. The Philadelphia mint did not strike the best of coins, that job was for San Francisco.

Tom

nepbrs44

MS-65 Very Nice! NT

vega1

NT. I suspect the coin may look better in person than in the picture(?) I vote 65.

anablep

NT 65
Nice and clean!

BillJones

The toning is original and pleasant, but nothing outstanding.

The coin is is an MS-64, which makes it original and pleasant also, but nothing outstanding.

poorguy

Toning is definitely natural and the coin seems to be right in line with an MS64 grade.

cartwheel

Well, it appears it's already in a PCGS slab, so I'd say NT. As for the grade, can't tell much about the luster, but I'm betting it pretty good, and few marks, so I'd say 65.

Cartwheel