Home U.S. Coin Forum

This might be a dumb question but..

Does anyone know why there isn't a 1933 or 1975 quarter? Is it just because there was a significant amount of quarters out in circulation? Any info would be appreciated
Thanks Coinnut86
image

Comments

  • airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,333 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Originally, the 1932 quarter was to be a one year commemorative for Washington's 200th birthday. In 1933, with the depression, coins were minted in much lower numbers, and the quarter's production was stopped. The design was very popular, so when they started minting quarters again in 1934, Washington stayed.

    The bicentennial coins (25c, 50c, $1) were minted in both 1975 and 1976, and all bear the 1776-1976 date. So there are 1975 quarters, they just don't bear the date.

    Jeremy
    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • coinnut86coinnut86 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭
    Wow thats interesting.. Thanks Jeremy
    image
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 34,598 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Another point about the missing 1933 quarter was that 1933 was during the WORST of The Great Depression. No body had much money, and new coins were not needed. The only coin the entire U.S. mint system issued in 1933 were cents, half dollars, $10 gold coins and perhaps 25 or 30 double eagles that the government claims escaped the mint illegally. image
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,159 ✭✭✭✭✭
    LOL, Jeremy is totally screwing with you. There were no quarters in 1933 because one of the mint employees was caught counterfeiting quarters. I can't remember his name offhand, I think it was something like Russ Craton (don't quote me on that though). He was fired and prosecuted and just to be safe the Mint melted down all quarters dated 1933 before they were sent out to the distribution points.

    He's telling you the truth about the 75-76 thing though.

    haha, nice try Jeremy! image




    Edited to add: Just to clarify...the top paragraph in my post is complete image



  • coinnut86coinnut86 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭


    << <i>LOL, Jeremy is totally screwing with you. There were no quarters in 1933 because one of the mint employees was caught counterfeiting quarters. I can't remember his name offhand, I think it was something like Russ Craton (don't quote me on that though). He was fired and prosecuted and just to be safe the Mint melted down all quarters dated 1933 before they were sent out to the distribution points.

    He's telling you the truth about the 75-76 thing though.

    haha, nice try Jeremy! image >>


    LOL sigh... now who to believe.. I can't decide what story I like better image
    image
  • carlcarl Posts: 2,054
    This is different from what I always thought about the 1933 Quarters. I thought someone at the Mint or somewhere added a second reverse 3 to the last 3 in order to make the 1938's.
    Carl
  • topstuftopstuf Posts: 14,803 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Your question (and ALL the answers you have gotten) is 100% clearer than this Ebay offering of 1932 quarters where the auction says it is five quarters but the description says it's one but apparently you get to pay "per each" and they all grade differently.

    It could have been something like this that happened in 1933 and made everyone just too confused to know what to do.

    Auction for five quarters....I think
  • coinnut86coinnut86 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭
    Ok...I found this site...not sure if it's reliable but it goes with airplanenuts story. I guess I'm not sure whos screwing with me image
    image
  • michaelmichael Posts: 9,524 ✭✭✭
    jeremy is totally correct

    besides being a nice young man
  • coinnut86coinnut86 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭
    I had a feeling Jeremy was correct, although I, a lowly "member" didnt want to doubt Cladiator, a "master collector" imageimage
    image
  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570

    Jeremy is a Rocket Man - that trumps a Master Collectorimage
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • fivecentsfivecents Posts: 11,207 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>Jeremy is a Rocket Man - that trumps a Master Collector >>

    Did Elton John say that or was that Robert Zimmerman?imageimage
  • CladiatorCladiator Posts: 18,159 ✭✭✭✭✭
    image Bwwaahhaahahahahahahahaaaa image
  • ...Well there's your answer, hope it helps.....imageimage
  • xbobxbob Posts: 1,979
    image

    They live. Link
    -Bob
    collections: Maryland related coins & exonumia, 7070 Type set, and Video Arcade Tokens.
    The Low Budget Y2K Registry Set
  • coinnut86coinnut86 Posts: 1,592 ✭✭✭
    wow
    image


  • << <i>jeremy is totally correct >>


    Jeremy is NOT totally correct. In 1975 they only struck the bicentennials for part of the year. Since the Mint was worried that there would be a coin shortage from everyone hoarding the bicentennials they got the legislation to permit them to strike the bicentennials for more than just in 1976. They would be permitted to strike them during the latter half of 1975 as well. But this created the problem that if they only struck 1975 quarters for the first six months, THEY might become a modern rariety, and at that time the mint lived in fear of creating a rare coin. So they got legislation through to allow a freeze on the dates of the 1974 quarters, halves, and dollars. So quartes struck in the first half of 1975 were dated 1974, and those struck in the last half were dated 1976.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file