Options
10,000 Post Contest/Poll: Which quote is not attributable to QDB?

Which of the following numismatic quotes is NOT attributable to Q David Bowers, and to whom is it attributed. Please give as much detail on the author as you can. Winner will get a copy of Doug Winter's "The Connoisseur's Guide to United States Gold Coins", along with a 1972 proof set, a 1973 proof set, a mercury dime, and a Barber quarter. I will end the contest over the weekend or whenever it dies its own natural death.
Please feel to add any comments regarding these pearls of wisdom, four of which were written by QDB in the 70's and probably have been repeated.
Please feel to add any comments regarding these pearls of wisdom, four of which were written by QDB in the 70's and probably have been repeated.
0
Comments
If not QDB, I'd be interested who said it. Probably has an interesting history.
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-major-sets/washington-quarters-date-set-circulation-strikes-1932-present/publishedset/209923
https://www.pcgs.com/setregistry/quarters/washington-quarters-major-sets/washington-quarters-date-set-circulation-strikes-1932-present/album/209923
Years ago, Lee F. Hewitt, publisher of the highly successful Numismatic Scrapbook Magazine, said, "There is no Santa Claus in numismatics. You get what you pay for."
Good eye Howards.
My TV Blog
http://www.shieldnickels.net
While he may have said it, it should not be attributable to him.
I think it was some Kris Kringle guy who originally said it anyway.
I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment
In 1935 Chicago Coin Club member Lee F. Hewitt began publishing the monthly Numismatic Scrapbook Magazine in response to the demand for greater numismatic information. With encouragement from Club members, Mr. Hewitt built this journal into a premier publication, which it remained until its sale in 1968 to Amos Press. Always aware of the latest numismatic trends, Mr. Hewitt attended nearly every meeting and often shared much valuable information.
FrederickCoinClub
#4 or #6 were my choices. I picked #6 on a swag. I cannot imagine him bashing a US coin design or not wanting completeness in a set.
The latter is a mercenary type approach to the hobby which is more in line with something like the Forecaster or RNA.
roadrunner
<< <i>Please feel to add any comments regarding these pearls of wisdom, four of which were written by QDB in the 70's and probably have been repeated. >>
#3 ... sounds too much like Laura S.
Happy Rock Wrens
You're having delusions of grandeur again. - Susan Ivanova
Well, if you're gonna have delusions, may as well go for the really satisfying ones. - Marcus Cole
You back home now? Any new wallet photos?
Go that way.
Really fast.
If something gets in your way, turn.
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
Howards is the winner as the first to identify the correct answer and the source of the quotation.
#4
because I doubt he would denigrate the Ike with a comment like that, and he appears to be a fan of 'Completeness'
#3 has been written numerous times, albeit in various forms.
#1 is a pithy, self-evident comment.
#2 is from Lee Hewitt, as mentioned elsewhere.
#4 was quite surprising to me. A prominent coin dealer speaking out against completing sets? The comment was in the context of promoting type sets, so perhaps it makes some sense.
#5 surprised me when I first read it, but it is mostly because of my communication with other type set collectors assembling the 7070 set. Of course, high-end type sets are also assembled (ie. Oliver Jung), and these can be vehicles for great profit or loss, depending on your luck, skill, connections, and timing.
#6 was also surprising, and I would not be surprised if QDB would like that one back. He was writing about how collectors may choose a series to collect and mentioned some designs that he favored and gave one example of a series he did not. In this context, the comment is more benign.