I like that idea but that actually has already been done. ANACS used to do this and it's a shame it didn't continue. People seem to think one number tells you all you need to know about a coin.
Here's the old Q & A thread from 2003 where I asked about the durability of the 70 point system. Back then, Mr.Hall didn't believe the 70 point system would change. I'm glad the discussion is on the table again.
Developing theory is what we are meant to do as academic researchers and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
The 100 point grading system debate has begun! The funny thing is that while the lions are fighting each other, they won't go after the lion tamer. The 100 point grading system is the perfect cloack for a brilliant marketing strategy the likes of which we've seen before --
-- Listerine and Gingivitis
-- Level II Quotes
Of course it will happen -- maybe not the 100 point scale -- but it will change because the "business" of numismatics has a great deal to gain from "any" change.
<< <i>Now I am curious how all old slabs would be regraded! Can we say ripoff! All the millions of TPG slabbed coins would be inaccurate or out dated!
Personally I think it would be a greek tragedy! I am very satisfied with the 70 pt scale. Most people in this hobby buy what they want any way, either the coin or the the holder!
Just my opinion!
Zach >>
This will make a lot of attorneys rich as many collectors will not roll over and play dead. can you say "class action"?
<< <i>Don't answer a question with a question, you'll flunk Debating-101. That post was nothing but a series of non sequiturs. Is it good for numismatics? That's the only criteria that matters. Want to try again, and answer the question this time? >>
I repeat.
<FONT face=Verdana>I think the effect on numismatics would be negligible. I don't even think the average collector would notice much difference. </FONT>
Time sure flies when you don't know what you're doing... My Web Sites
<< <i>From a recent PCGS Set Registry email about the luncheon at the upcoming FUN Show.
<< <i>At the luncheon we will present a special panel discussion on grading. Our panelists will discuss the history of grading, the grading scale, and the future of grading. In addition, we will have an open discussion on whether or not the rare coin market should adopt a 100-point grading scale. >>
I think this would be a disaster, but it is obviously on the radar screen. And I can see why PCGS would be behind it. $$$$$$$$$$ So what do you think about 100 points? >>
The more I think about it, a 55 gallon drum of worms is about to be opened up!
DORAN COINS - On Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), & www.dorancoins.net - UPCOMING SHOWS (tentative dates)- 2/26/2026 - Joliet, IL
Comments
>>>Wear
>>>Luster
>>>Eye Appeal
I like that idea but that actually has already been done. ANACS used to do this and it's a shame it didn't continue. People seem to think one number tells you all you need to know about a coin.
jom
and it sets us apart from practitioners and consultants. Gregor
Maybe he wanted to make sure that he had a real good attendance?
Add a decimal point to the existing one that will keep everyone happy and it will be much easier spotting the upgrade candidates-
The 100 point grading system debate has begun! The funny thing is that while the lions are fighting each other, they won't go after the lion tamer. The 100 point grading system is the perfect cloack for a brilliant marketing strategy the likes of which we've seen before --
-- Listerine and Gingivitis
-- Level II Quotes
Of course it will happen -- maybe not the 100 point scale -- but it will change because the "business" of numismatics has a great deal to gain from "any" change.
<< <i>I might support the idea if it was implemented in a sensible way, such as:
1) Leave the current circulated grades as is.
2) An uncirculated coin automatically gets 60 points, plus 1 to 10 points for each of the following:
Strike 1-10
Luster/Mirrors 1-10
Hits/hairlines/etc 1-10
Originality 1-10
Thus, an MS or Proof coin could grade 90 with the further distinction of (8-8-7-7) to indicate how the
final grade was arrived at.
I believe this could help people learn to grade more accurately.
Ken >>
This is one of the best posts ever and deserves more attention.
In any case, thanks Solid.
<< <i>Now I am curious how all old slabs would be regraded! Can we say ripoff! All the millions of TPG slabbed coins would be inaccurate or out dated!
Personally I think it would be a greek tragedy! I am very satisfied with the 70 pt scale. Most people in this hobby buy what they want any way, either the coin or the the holder!
Just my opinion!
Zach >>
This will make a lot of attorneys rich as many collectors will not roll over and play dead. can you say "class action"?
<< <i>Don't answer a question with a question, you'll flunk Debating-101. That post was nothing but a series of non sequiturs. Is it good for numismatics? That's the only criteria that matters. Want to try again, and answer the question this time? >>
I repeat.
<FONT face=Verdana>I think the effect on numismatics would be negligible. I don't even think the average collector would notice much difference. </FONT>
My Web Sites
<< <i>From a recent PCGS Set Registry email about the luncheon at the upcoming FUN Show.
<< <i>At the luncheon we will present a special panel discussion on grading. Our panelists will discuss the history of grading, the grading scale, and the future of grading. In addition, we will have an open discussion on whether or not the rare coin market should adopt a 100-point grading scale. >>
I think this would be a disaster, but it is obviously on the radar screen. And I can see why PCGS would be behind it. $$$$$$$$$$ So what do you think about 100 points? >>
The more I think about it, a 55 gallon drum of worms is about to be opened up!