Options
Grade these two IH's

Both are imaged by Heritage to keep the photography consistent, and both are post 1886 designs. The slabs are cut out, the dates and possible mintmarks are blacked out. Granted, the date is an important part of the grading process -- in more ways than one. Don't cheat by visiting their archives!

Paul <> altered surfaces <> CoinGallery.org
0
Comments
Bottom one: MS-66 Red
Tom
65 RD
66 RD
And please enter me in your giveaway
Top coin MS65RB maybe a 1909S
Bottom coin MS66RD maybe a 1908S
top Ms-65R (although I think its closer to high RB than RD) but still holdered as red
the bottom Ms-66rd (IMO, though a 65 bumped for extremely sharp luster and color)
The second looks about PCGS67R.
Jeff
or should I say I ACCUMULATE!
I also dabble with the darkside
Ive recently gotten more into currency, especially modern star notes
Second 66RD. funny line on the cheak bugs me but is pretty dang nice otherwise.
(Notice that was a poem?)
Russ, NCNE
CG
67Rd
"The date is an important part of the grading process" is my point about this coin. This is a market graded 08-S all the way. Keep in mind I'm judging this by Heritage's pics, it may be much brighter in person. But I doubt the strike and condition looks any different in person. Besides the typical weak first few feather tip strikes this coin has many obverse problems -- spots above the T of UNITED, below the M of AMERICA, between the O and F of OF -- for starters. It's a very rough looking coin for a 66RD, even for a 1908-S.
Coin #2 is an NGC 1895 MS66RD.
"Seu cabra da peste,
"Sou Mangueira......."
<< <i>Grade these two IH's >>
I grade 'em both "gorgeous".
Now, grade these two...
(Sorry, I couldn't resist.)
bottom has more marks that the top but better luster 65RED
- Groucho Marx
yours are BU
Butt Ugly.
TL,
The 1908S you posted has about the best strike I have seen of that date. A super scarce coin with full feather tips. That looks like it could be a 67 without the small scratch in front of her face. What a coin!