Grading experiment, Part 2. Make sure you do part one first.
OK. I figured that I'd bring out Part two a bit early. Just make sure you do part 1 first. No cheating. Grade the four coins, bigger pics this time.
Coin #1:


Coin #2:


Coin #3:


Coin #4:


Coin #1:
Coin #2:
Coin #3:
Coin #4:
coinimaging.com/my photography articles Check out the new macro lens testing section
0
Comments
MS-66, Red (same as before)
MS-66 (down a point)
MS-66 (same as before)
#1: 65Brown (Added: Same numeric, dropped from RB)
#2: 64Red (Dropped from 66....Probably too harsh)
#3: 65 (Same)
#4: 65 (Dropped from 67....And I don't regret it)
Of course, I claim no expertise in grading to begin with.....
65 RD (was 66RD)
65 (was 66)
66 (was 66)
Please check out my eBay auctions!
My WLH Short Set Registry Collection
2. MS-65RD (Same as before)
3. MS-65 (One point lower)
4. MS-66 (One point lower)
Even better pictures.
Tom
64RB
64
66
Not sure what I did last time
63
64
64
Knowledge is the enemy of fear
#1 looks cleaned. why does the luster all go in one direction? You can see like something
"wizzed" it all in one direction. and then, the direction changes when you flip it.
I have no idea why people can call that ms65 or better. more like ms62-63
#2 has great eye appeal, but not as strong a strike as #1. look at the acorns on the
reverse, as well as the leaves. this coin though, does truly appear to be MS64+
i wonder if it is possible to dip a copper coin like that to make it so nice. so shiny, lusturous.
#3 is AU
#4 is MS 64.
my orig thoughts were
#1 MS62
#2 MS64
#3 AU58
#4 MS64
4 (same) ...but RD
6 (down one)...and low end
6 (up one)
<< <i>why does the luster (on 1868) all go in one direction? >>
That pattern of toning is common on early indian cents proof and MS (1860's and early 70's). Similar to woodgrain toning on early lincolns.
64RB (+1)
64RD (Was RB)
65 (Same)
65 (Same)
64 RD (was 65 RD)
65 (same)
66 (same)
I like these photos better!
64RD
65
66
MS64 RD (down 1 point)
MS64- same
MS66 - same
Aerospace Structures Engineer
66 R (same as before)
63 (down 2)
64 (down one point)
64RD (down one)
65 (down two)
66 (same)
Edited for obviously forgetting to look at the Washington!
The Ludlow Brilliant Collection (1938-64)
I guess we'll find out if that comfort was a good, or a bad thing!
I hope you're tracking these results....you've gotten me quite interested.
63rb
64rd
no-grade ? color throws me...tough enough to read luster,but toning tough to know even when its in your hand.
seemingly properly curated `43 Washie, MS65
65 RD
64
65
MS-63BN MS-64RB
MS-65/66 RD MS-64 RD
MS-64 MS-64
MS-66 MS-65/66
MS65RD
MS67
MS66
No change.
Russ, NCNE
MS64RD
MS64
MS66
One change...
They call me "Pack the Ripper"
1 -- MS65RB (+1)
2 -- MS64RD (-1)
3 -- MS64* (-2)
4 -- MS65 (+1)
John
minor changes for me..
1. 64 RB to 64 Brown
2. 66 Red to 65 Red
3. same
4. same
Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.
make them more visible..
Please check out my eBay auctions!
My WLH Short Set Registry Collection
1905 1 Cent MS-64 Red
1964 25 Cent MS-66Star
1943 25 Cent MS-66
Super Grades for a Awesome set of Coins.
rabbitracks toned showcase set
myurl
rabbitracks toned showcase set
myurl
AU55 RED
MS62
MS63
09/07/2006
1)66 RB (***not quite sure of strike on these, Looks weak on the ear and headband, if it is rub it would make it AU58 RB)
2)65 RD ***
3)64
4)65
*************
My answers from Part 1
1)65 RB
2)66 RD
3)65
4)64
#2 still MS65 RD
#3 MS63 (up from AU58)
#4 stilll MS66
MS65RD (same as before)
MS65 (I guessed MS64 before)
MS66 (same as before)
mcmxi,
With the exception of super high grades (MS68 and up), die cracks usually don't affect the grade unless they reduce eye appeal significantly.
Many people actually like die cracks (I'm one of them) since they add an element of character to the coin.