Jeff Nickel guys: Is an 1939 rev. of 38 in Proof 67 anything special?

SethChandler

I just had an original 1939 Proof set slabbed, and that is how the nickel came out.

midwestcoin13

no idea

kieferscoins

PM Keets. He will know.

Cameron Kiefer

ss350camaro

<< <i> no idea >>



Boy, talk about too much information Or is it post count padding maybe ?


Seth,

I would think in PR67 it surely must be "something" ?

keets

hey Seth

any Jefferson early Proof in PR67 is special. you're referring, of course, to the two different Reverses of which the Rev. of 1938 is the more common. the prices are as follows, ballpark of course, for an average grade coin:

1939 Reverse of 1938 PCGS PR67 approximately $350+.
1939 Reverse of 1940 PCGS PR67 approximately $1500+.

al h.

midwestcoin13

<< <i>

<< <i> no idea >>



Boy, talk about too much information Or is it post count padding maybe ?


Seth,

I would think in PR67 it surely must be "something" ? >>



just sharing my infenite wisdom

Monstavet

Al beat me to it. I would agree completely. PR67 is soemthing nice in and of itself. Any toning or cameo effect?

badger

Proof 67 in the prewar Jeffs is always a good thing. I have seen some great looking PR67 with toning that make keeper coins for the collection. The reverse 1940 is rarer.

Keets - I'll take that 1939 Rev 40 PR67 for $1500.

CarlWohlforth

I've had both reverses in PR 67 When I had them there were no PR 68 Jeffs from 1938-1942. Now there are some. As Keets points out the '39 rev of '38 is what used to be labeled just plain 1939. Anyway that sounds like a neat proof set! Were the other denominations gem+ also?

Cameonut

Badger is right - I've seen an ugly '39 rev '40 in 67 offered for $1750. Not many around in that grade. I'll buy 'em all day at $1500.

CoinAddict

We need to see pics of the whole set.