Home U.S. Coin Forum

Old Copper and/or Colonial Collectors: What Are These Three all About?

braddickbraddick Posts: 23,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
I picked up a small grouping of interesting older copper recently from a local shop. I have since, mistakingly, sold one, and before I repeat my error I'd like more information regarding these three. Even speculations would be helpful!
Thanks.
Looks like a it was struck over another coin. It is the size of a large cent- maybe slightly larger.
image
image

This one has a dual date. 1794 on one side and 1795 on another. No appearance of an alteration either. Ever so slightly smaller than the first coin shown.
image
image

This last one looks like a counterfeit. About the size of a quarter, give or take.
image
image

peacockcoins

Comments

  • cosmicdebriscosmicdebris Posts: 12,332 ✭✭✭
    First 2 look like Conder Tokens and the 3rd an Irish farthing maybe.
    Bill

    image

    09/07/2006
  • OKbustchaserOKbustchaser Posts: 5,483 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The first is a token issued by the London bookseller J. Lackington. I know that I have seen the second, but it escapes me right now. The third is a Wood's Hibernia--either a farthing (slightly smaller than a quarter and my guess) or a half penny (slightly larger than a quarter).

    Jim
    Just because I'm old doesn't mean I don't love to look at a pretty bust.
  • Pictures aren't showing up for me.
  • PutTogetherPutTogether Posts: 2,141 ✭✭✭
    me either
    im not an expert at all, but sure would like to see
  • OKbustchaserOKbustchaser Posts: 5,483 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TTT since the photos are showing again.

    Jim
    Just because I'm old doesn't mean I don't love to look at a pretty bust.
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,967 ✭✭✭✭✭
    The third one is a counterfeit Hibernia half penny. The British made these coins for Ireland, but enough of them got over to the American colonies to rate a spot in the Red Book. The piece looks like a crude cast copy and probably is not worth much of anything.

    The first two look like Condor tokens, but that’s not one of my areas of expertise. It appears that the first is a double strike, but beyond that I can’t help you.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 23,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thanks guys (it looks like my host server is up and running... at least for a bit!). The dual date on the second item has me curious.

    peacockcoins

  • braddickbraddick Posts: 23,975 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TTT for the midday crowd.

    peacockcoins

  • TUMUSSTUMUSS Posts: 2,207
    Here is another example of the first. I have not researched it???
    image
    image
  • The first is a Conder token from J Lackington of Middlesex. He was a dealer in new and second hand books. He issud about ten different varieties of tokens, all of which are common. This one is part of a series with similar designs D&H 353 - 358. I don't have my copy of D&H with me but I believe it is either 357 or 358. It has been double struck with the first strike having been rotated about 90 degrees and off-center from the final strike.

    The scond token is also a Conder token. It is a mule of two dies that were used for oher token series and then later used together to create an anonymous issue for general circulation. The dies were not originally meant to be used together. That is why they have different dates. I'll try and get you more information later.

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file