Morgan grade?

Blackhawk · February 17, 2005 4:17AM

I got an 1889 Morgan today, very clean cheek, decent lustre, and blue toning around the rim. Pardon my pics, as I cannot take decent photos that show lustre and toning with my camera with just sunlight.

ER · February 17, 2005 4:18AM

58

Prethen · February 17, 2005 4:21AM

To many areas of rub for 58; maybe 53.

wam98 · February 17, 2005 4:24AM

AU-58 IMHO, I like that Morgan and it's original looking skin.

Good clear photo also.

Betta285 · February 17, 2005 4:25AM

58 in IMHO. Looks very clean, but as Prethen said, a lot of rub, but i have seen worse 58's

jim

Prethen · February 17, 2005 4:27AM

I just saw a bit of irony with that last post being number "666" and your icon.

That'll only happen once to ya!

<< <i>58 in IMHO. Looks very clean, but as Prethen said, a lot of rub, but i have seen worse 58's

jim >>

wam98 · February 17, 2005 4:48AM

Blackhawk, here's an AU-58 graded by PCGS.

Just to compare.

DennisH · February 17, 2005 5:06AM

AU55/58... lustre will have a lot to say either way.

ddbird · February 17, 2005 5:28AM

I think its just a weak strike...if luster is there, and it looks that clean, 63

Nocerino18 · February 17, 2005 5:35AM

AU-55

Morgan grade?

Comments

Leave a Comment