Ready for another episode of "Grade that Morgan"?

CarlWohlforth

Here she is:

RGL

Love the clean cheek, hard to gauge luster ... I'll be charitable and say ... 66? But what do I know?

CarlWohlforth

1878-S

It has decent fields that reflect fairly well. The devices are frosted but not heavy cameo frost. The coin has light tan toning which makes it look a bit dull.

RickMilauskas

I'll say MS 65. If we were able to see through that frost/grey toning it might have a contrasting cameo look warranting it a PL designation.

100proof1957

65

Rampage

My guess would be 66PL. If the picture is giving it the funky PL look, then I say 66.

kieferscoins

MS-65.

Cameron Kiefer

grip

Same thing Rampage said.
...........
Al

CarlWohlforth

I was thinking this is a case where the toning is hurting the eye appeal of this coin. I am seriously considering sending it to NCS for a dipping

KurtHorn

I would say without the "haze" that it's a 66 shot 67...

Rampage

<< <i>I was thinking this is a case where the toning is hurting the eye appeal of this coin. I am seriously considering sending it to NCS for a dipping >>



So, are you saying this is an MS67??!! Or better yet, an MS67PL??? Dip that thing.....

fountainheadgold

66

grip

<< <i>I was thinking this is a case where the toning is hurting the eye appeal of this coin. I am seriously considering sending it to NCS for a dipping >>



I agree,and think it would go a 7+..Thats one clean queen.
Al...............If I had it I would dip her myself.

wam98

I'll say 65 at least.

anablep

65
nice!

Windycity

66 - shot 67 but looks like slight rim dents on the reverse. Hard to tell from pics.

CarlWohlforth

Thanks for all the comments! I will send this one to NCS for sure (well, maybe I should send it to grip )

It is currently graded MS 65 DMPL by ACG. I think it could end up 65/66 PL... We will see.


Edited to add: Yup there look like a hit at 9:30 on the reverse rim.

CarlWohlforth

All guesses were 65 or higher. There are no replies after I revealed ACG graded this coin 65 DMPL. There is no shame in agreeing with ACG as nobody thought this coin was DMPL. So it is OK to say ACG got the 65 part right....