I don't like the way to tone comes across the coin from around 2 o'clock on the rev. Looks a like heat was applied. The band running from 10:30 to 3:30 look pretty good though. I'm certainly not an expert. What are your thoughts?
I've seen enough slabbed toner morgans of similar stature on this forum to know that yours is NT baby! Technical grade? what do you guys think? 63? 64?
<< <i>I don't like the way to tone comes across the coin from around 2 o'clock on the rev. Looks a like heat was applied. The band running from 10:30 to 3:30 look pretty good though. I'm certainly not an expert. What are your thoughts? >>
First of all, goose was right. I would never buy a raw coin unless I was certain it was the real thing.
This seller has poor lighting and compensated for it by over exposing the images. The pattern you see on the reverse is a true rainbow due to bag toning. This coin appears to be at least MS63. When I get it I'll post nice large images of it.
I assume its real because I can't imagine that the value of an 1888 Morgan in MS63 would be greatly enhanced by artificially toning it in a way that is attractive but hardly monstrous.
I vote real, but I don't think that it is the type of toning pattern that convinces people to pay a insane money.
Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?
It's real and pretty piece. I was watching it, but just never felt like bidding. So Eric, you owe me for the money I saved you (unless whatever random numbers I punched in would have meant I won )
<< <i>I obviously have alot to learn in this area. How does bag toning form? Is it formed because a part f the coin comes into contact with the bag? >>
That, or very close to the bag. There was a great detailed explanation posted here sometime back, but I can't recall the link. If you go to the search here, try bag toning or bag toned and select title or body and you should have plenty to read.
"Is it (bag toning) formed because a part of the coin comes into contact with the bag?
Yes. A key question for the prospective purchaser to answer for himself or herself when looking at a Morgan that purports to have gotten its toning from being in a mint bag for many years (NT) is,
"Is the shape of the perimeter of the toning pattern consistent with the coin's having gotten its toning while in a mint bag?"
If one sees "straightness" on the perimeter of the toning pattern that indicates to the prospective purchaser that the coin's toning was gotten in some way other than its being in a mint bag.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
Always took candy from strangers Didn't wanna get me no trade Never want to be like papa Working for the boss every night and day --"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
<< <i>Got any coins like this that you have graded 61 for sale? >>
Sure, they are not worth sending in for grading. Which is why that one was raw. I sold a bunch of GSA CC's like that also. And as I said the coin could go 62 or could be bagged for what appears to be a scratch below states. If you're real lucky the coin will be better than the scan, but I doubt it.
<< <i>NT MS 61-62 with possible BB for staple scratch beneath States. >>
My thoughts were the same if that is indeed a scratch. If I owned it I would expect a net grade of scratched, uncir. details. Looks NT to me and I agree the the photo has been over exposed.
<< <i>Got any coins like this that you have graded 61 for sale? >>
Sure, they are not worth sending in for grading. Which is why that one was raw. I sold a bunch of GSA CC's like that also. And as I said the coin could go 62 or could be bagged for what appears to be a scratch below states. If you're real lucky the coin will be better than the scan, but I doubt it.
CG >>
I see, so if it isn't in a slab it isn't worth anything and it isn't in a slab for a reason. Where's dorkkarl when we need him?
I'm glad I don't think like that. I bought a raw Morgan last summer on eBay for $32. PCGS graded it 66. Oh, and when I posted that one here, several people called it a 62.
Another thing to look at is "freshness" of the untoned surfaces. Dollars that have come out of a mint-bag will have their "whiteness" that is akin to the "yellowness" of natural gold as found in the prospector's pan.
The untoned parts of K6AZ's coin look mighty white to me. Almost paradoxically, the final stage of toning for a Morgan dollar that has been sealed in a mint bag for many years results in black, the color of Silver Sulfide.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
To me, this is one of those that will look much, much better in hand. I bet the colors will be bold as well as vibrant. It's the photo quality that's the problem, IMO. Good eye, Eric. I'm wondering if the photo saved you some bidding money as well?
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
<< <i>I see, so if it isn't in a slab it isn't worth anything and it isn't in a slab for a reason. Where's dorkkarl when we need him? >>
Who said that. I said that it wasn't worth slabbing--its a baggy common date coin that grades no higher than 62 and might be a no grade due to a scratch. It is not worthless its just worth less than the cost of slabbing.
<< <i> I bought a raw Morgan last summer on eBay for $32. PCGS graded it 66. >>
What does that have to do with this baggy, possibly scratched coin?
One of the wonderful things about this forum is that members can post a low end, baggy ms62 coin and people will tell him that its super gem.
<< <i>I see, so if it isn't in a slab it isn't worth anything and it isn't in a slab for a reason. Where's dorkkarl when we need him? >>
Who said that. I said that it wasn't worth slabbing--its a baggy common date coin that grades no higher than 62 and might be a no grade due to a scratch. It is not worthless its just worth less than the cost of slabbing.
<< <i> I bought a raw Morgan last summer on eBay for $32. PCGS graded it 66. >>
What does that have to do with this baggy, possibly scratched coin?
One of the wonderful things about this forum is that members can post a low end, baggy ms62 coin and people will tell him that its super gem.
CG >>
I've seen you lowball enough coins on this board. And it's funny, a lot of times you tell people you can't grade from photos, but here you are declaring the coin is a 62. The question was real or NT - now you want to turn this into a grading debate.
Comments
I don't think you would buy one if you thought it was AT.
Please check out my eBay auctions!
My WLH Short Set Registry Collection
<< <i>I don't think its real. Sorry. >>
And your basis for this conclusion?
Chris
My Collection of Old Holders
Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
around 2 o'clock on the rev. Looks a like heat was applied.
The band running from 10:30 to 3:30 look pretty good though.
I'm certainly not an expert. What are your thoughts?
Please check out my eBay auctions!
My WLH Short Set Registry Collection
<< <i>I don't like the way to tone comes across the coin from
around 2 o'clock on the rev. Looks a like heat was applied.
The band running from 10:30 to 3:30 look pretty good though.
I'm certainly not an expert. What are your thoughts? >>
First of all, goose was right. I would never buy a raw coin unless I was certain it was the real thing.
This seller has poor lighting and compensated for it by over exposing the images. The pattern you see on the reverse is a true rainbow due to bag toning. This coin appears to be at least MS63. When I get it I'll post nice large images of it.
Doug
Check my ebay BIN or Make Offers!!
******
Bag toning.
MS63 at best.
The Lincoln cent store:
http://www.lincolncent.com
My numismatic art work:
http://www.cdaughtrey.com
USAF veteran, 1986-1996 :: support our troops - the American way.
If heat was applied both sides of coin would show toning, correct???
Nice find Eric, I'm gonna call that a 63.
Greg
NoEbayAuctionsForNow
Is it formed because a part f the coin comes into contact with the bag?
Please check out my eBay auctions!
My WLH Short Set Registry Collection
<< <i>I obviously have alot to learn in this area. How does bag toning form?
Is it formed because a part f the coin comes into contact with the bag? >>
That, or very close to the bag. There was a great detailed explanation posted here sometime back, but I can't recall the link. If you go to the search here, try bag toning or bag toned and select title or body and you should have plenty to read.
Yes. A key question for the prospective purchaser to answer for himself or herself when looking at a Morgan that purports to have gotten its toning from being in a mint bag for many years (NT) is,
"Is the shape of the perimeter of the toning pattern consistent with the coin's having gotten its toning while in a mint bag?"
If one sees "straightness" on the perimeter of the toning pattern that indicates to the prospective purchaser that the coin's toning was gotten in some way other than its being in a mint bag.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
BigGreek, check out this thread:
Myths about toning
<< <i>NT MS 61-62 with possible BB for staple scratch beneath States. >>
Got any coins like this that you have graded 61 for sale?
What poor honest bidder did you steal that from under ???
<< <i>Got any coins like this that you have graded 61 for sale? >>
Sure, they are not worth sending in for grading. Which is why that one was raw. I sold a bunch of GSA CC's like that also. And as I said the coin could go 62 or could be bagged for what appears to be a scratch below states. If you're real lucky the coin will be better than the scan, but I doubt it.
CG
<< <i>NT MS 61-62 with possible BB for staple scratch beneath States. >>
My thoughts were the same if that is indeed a scratch. If I owned it I would expect a net grade of scratched, uncir. details. Looks NT to me and I agree the the photo has been over exposed.
<< <i>
<< <i>Got any coins like this that you have graded 61 for sale? >>
Sure, they are not worth sending in for grading. Which is why that one was raw. I sold a bunch of GSA CC's like that also. And as I said the coin could go 62 or could be bagged for what appears to be a scratch below states. If you're real lucky the coin will be better than the scan, but I doubt it.
CG >>
I see, so if it isn't in a slab it isn't worth anything and it isn't in a slab for a reason. Where's dorkkarl when we need him?
I'm glad I don't think like that. I bought a raw Morgan last summer on eBay for $32. PCGS graded it 66. Oh, and when I posted that one here, several people called it a 62.
<< <i>Looks good to me, Eric...
What poor honest bidder did you steal that from under ??? >>
Hey, you still mad at me over the ANACS 87? You know I got sniped on that, lost it by $1.
The untoned parts of K6AZ's coin look mighty white to me. Almost paradoxically, the final stage of toning for a Morgan dollar that has been sealed in a mint bag for many years results in black, the color of Silver Sulfide.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
<< <i>I see, so if it isn't in a slab it isn't worth anything and it isn't in a slab for a reason. Where's dorkkarl when we need him? >>
Who said that. I said that it wasn't worth slabbing--its a baggy common date coin that grades no higher than 62 and might be a no grade due to a scratch. It is not worthless its just worth less than the cost of slabbing.
<< <i> I bought a raw Morgan last summer on eBay for $32. PCGS graded it 66. >>
What does that have to do with this baggy, possibly scratched coin?
One of the wonderful things about this forum is that members can post a low end, baggy ms62 coin and people will tell him that its super gem.
CG
<< <i>
<< <i>I see, so if it isn't in a slab it isn't worth anything and it isn't in a slab for a reason. Where's dorkkarl when we need him? >>
Who said that. I said that it wasn't worth slabbing--its a baggy common date coin that grades no higher than 62 and might be a no grade due to a scratch. It is not worthless its just worth less than the cost of slabbing.
<< <i> I bought a raw Morgan last summer on eBay for $32. PCGS graded it 66. >>
What does that have to do with this baggy, possibly scratched coin?
One of the wonderful things about this forum is that members can post a low end, baggy ms62 coin and people will tell him that its super gem.
CG >>
I've seen you lowball enough coins on this board. And it's funny, a lot of times you tell people you can't grade from photos, but here you are declaring the coin is a 62. The question was real or NT - now you want to turn this into a grading debate.