What I get concerned about is when these people go over to the CLCT messageboard on yahoo.com and start ranting and raving over there. Granted most of the people who would view those messageboards probably don't know a 1952 Topps card from a cheeseburger, but when these guys pop off at the mouth about things, I wonder how their posts are viewed by the uninformed.
BTW, David, is there any way of knowing how many cards were affected? As I posted earlier, people have thrown out #'s from 100, 1000, 10,000, etc., and it might help to calm people's fears if we had even some sort of clue as to how many cards were potentially swapped.
I'm glad all this has finally been brought out here...I just wish it was sooner. Seems this is all reactive rather than proactive. Reactive=bad Proactive=good
Comments
Really bad...the same lies and half-truths.
What I get concerned about is when these people go over to the CLCT messageboard on yahoo.com and start ranting and raving over there. Granted most of the people who would view those messageboards probably don't know a 1952 Topps card from a cheeseburger, but when these guys pop off at the mouth about things, I wonder how their posts are viewed by the uninformed.
BTW, David, is there any way of knowing how many cards were affected? As I posted earlier, people have thrown out #'s from 100, 1000, 10,000, etc., and it might help to calm people's fears if we had even some sort of clue as to how many cards were potentially swapped.
Reactive=bad
Proactive=good