Explanation of Buffalo Nickel Prices?
ChuckC
Posts: 1,600
I noticed that the PCGS population for an MS66 1938-D buffalo nickel is:
17,919 in 66
1,039 in 67
6 in 68.
Why does this coin trend for around $50-$60 when a full band merc such as a 40-D with a PCGS population of 740 in 66FB, 241 in 67FB, and 20 in 68 FB goes for roughly the same price? Are buffalos hotter than FB mercs? Is this a poor comparion or example in making this assumption? Are Buffalo prices long due for a downturn?
BTW, I want to buy a MS buffalo just to have in my repertoire of coins...what is your opinion of this particular coin?
17,919 in 66
1,039 in 67
6 in 68.
Why does this coin trend for around $50-$60 when a full band merc such as a 40-D with a PCGS population of 740 in 66FB, 241 in 67FB, and 20 in 68 FB goes for roughly the same price? Are buffalos hotter than FB mercs? Is this a poor comparion or example in making this assumption? Are Buffalo prices long due for a downturn?
BTW, I want to buy a MS buffalo just to have in my repertoire of coins...what is your opinion of this particular coin?
0
Comments
Hoot
Hoot
<< <i>Ah, thanks for the replies... so what is meant by type 3? I thought there were only two types of buffalo nickels. >>
Type 2 buffalo nickels are the buffalo on plain subtype that appeared from 1913 through 1915. These have rougher fields than later date pieces but not as rough of fields at the 1913 T1 buffalo on mound pieces. Beginning in 1916, the Mint re-worked the master hub, more clearly defined LIBERTY and brought to final smoothness the fields of the coin. Definition of devices were improved throughout and slight modification was made to the hair of the Indian - subtle, but noticeable. Non-specialists do not often recognize this subtype, but if you collect the series or study the nickels of 1913-16, then you will find the differences readily distinct.
Hoot
Once you factor them in, you will then see that the 1940-D merc dimes are not as "cold" or "scarce" as shown in your post relative to their price.
Thanks Hoot for the good info. I've never heard the type 3 reference used either and coincidently was just recently looking at a 1914's type 1 like textured fields wondering when they became smooth.
Hoot