Are these $5 Indian heads Fake ? Good Pics 1914's and 1910
Bass2005
Posts: 44
Are these five dollars Fake or not ???
I bought them at the Paris Coin Show while in Paris, France.
The Rims on the the 1914's do not look right. on the 1910 it looks nice and I bought it form another seller at the show.
any Grades on these Coins ??
I bought them at the Paris Coin Show while in Paris, France.
The Rims on the the 1914's do not look right. on the 1910 it looks nice and I bought it form another seller at the show.
any Grades on these Coins ??
0
Comments
Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."
<< <i>They look like counterfeits to me - sorry. >>
How did you determine they were fakes? Specifics if possible.
Thanks,
Millertime
Complete Dime Set
Can you give us a full shot of 1 coin both sides?
<< <i>How did you determine they were fakes? Specifics if possible >>
Certainly a fair question - now you're going to make me work for my pay.
One thing I noticed is the too-similar of an appearance between the fields and the devices - they should look different/distinct in terms of luster, texture (which is too uniform), etc.
Also, there is a conspicuous lack of detail in the Indian's headdress/feathers, in particular.
Generally speaking, when gold coins look too good, they are in fact "bad" as in fake.
Please note, images can be misleading and I might be incorrect in my assessment, but I'm pretty darned sure in this instance.
I'm just saying what I see. The 'L", "A" & "R" don't look the same & the top talon on the left foot appears to be out of place.
Repeat: I don't collect gold coins so I could be totally wrong here
Glenn
This is a good rule of thumb. The lack of detail doesn't make these Indians look "good," however. What makes them look "good" is the lack of marks on the surfaces.
Bass, how much did you pay for these, if I may ask? This is not really my or anyone else's business so if you don't care to share this information with us all that certainly is your perogative.
It might be instructive, in a constructive way, for others if you decide to disclose here how much you paid.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
<< <i>200 euros each for the 1914's and 270 euro for the 1910. that would be $260 each for the 1914's and $351 for the 1910. >>
What inspired you to spend that much on these coins raw if you could not accurately identify if they were fake or not? By the way, the 14s both have the same scratch/crack/indentation under United on the reverse, which means they were likely both punched off the same die - I'm not aware of any varieties from the Mint that have this attribute. About 90% certainty that these are counterfeit based on the pictures.
Self Indulgence | Holey Coins | Flickr Photostream
and many others but these ones i did not send yet ...
<< <i>i bought a lot of coins at the show, i got a $20 1874 for 550 euros about $700 and it got rated as an MS63.
and many others but these ones i did not send yet ... >>
Well send them into ANACS and see what they have to say, then. Regardless, if you scored a 1874 Double Eagle that made it into MS63 PCGS Plastic for $700, then you've paid for any possible mistakes and then some.
Self Indulgence | Holey Coins | Flickr Photostream
<< <i>i bought a lot of coins at the show, i got a $20 1874 for 550 euros about $700 and it got rated as an MS63.
and many others but these ones i did not send yet ... >>
You have any pics of the 1874 ???
Herb
<< <i>I have a bad feeling about these coins .............. >>
I feel your pain. These $5 and the $2.5 Indians are my favorites designs. My first purchase (which Mark Feld, aka coinguy1, was kind enough to evaluate for me) was a 1909 $2.5 Indian graded by NTC as MS63. It's at PCGS now but has a decent chance of being BB'd for a cleaning. If it isn't BB's then Mark says the grade should be MS61. It's not a total loss because I paid 62 money ($540) for it and not 63 money ($1900).
Millertime
Complete Dime Set
Please allow me to respond to this question.
If Bass got burned it wasn't as bad as it can get. Getting really burned would be if he had paid over a $1000 each (MS 63 common date Indian 5's are listed @ $1750 in 2005 Red book) for these strongly-suspected-by-most-of-us here to be fake Indians. Bass got first degree burns instead of third degree burns. That's just my opinion.
The pieces looked good to Bass and that's why he bought them. The coins looked "right," the price seemed "right."
Considerations concerning Bass's spending "that much" are not all that useful, Doug.
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.-Albert Einstein
<< <i>darktone, you might want to take a closer look at tlhoy's side-by-side close-up images. Note the sharpness in detail of the PCGS coin and compare to Bass's coin. >>
Look at the olive branch, or whatever kinda branch that is, they don't look the same to me.
I bought a raw Indian at auction, gonna dig up the pics and compare my coin to the pics posted. (fingers crossed).
Herb
edited to add........YES, mine looks like the real deal!!!
Herb
Herb
<< <i>Certainly a fair question - now you're going to make me work for my pay. >>
Mark, Should I send you a Dollar?
“It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.” Mark Twain
Newmismatist
I also think those rims are a dead giveaway....
jom
Russ, NCNE