Home U.S. Coin Forum

What Would ICG Need to Do to Win Over Your Business?

braddickbraddick Posts: 23,967 ✭✭✭✭✭
I just read the full page CoinWorld ad for ICG and it struck me: It would appear the fundamentals are in place for ICG to be more successful than they currently are. What would ICG need to do to win you over? What would they need to do to earn your business?

peacockcoins

Comments

  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,082 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Buy PCGS!
    theknowitalltroll;
  • They need to win over the dealers.
  • FairlanemanFairlaneman Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I will PM you with a little story that happened at the Portland ANA Show.
  • goose3goose3 Posts: 11,471 ✭✭✭
    sell out to ANACS/NGC/or PCGS.
  • RYKRYK Posts: 35,797 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That's an excellent question, Pat. Unfortunately, at this point in the game, they could probably do everything 100% correctly and consistently and still not gain traction. The Top 2 have a wide economic moat and #3 ANACS has a niche and large following. I think #1 or #2 would have to fumble badly for #4 to move up. In other words, I do not think it is in their control.

    Now if ICG were purchased by Heritage, that would be interesting...
  • pharmerpharmer Posts: 8,355
    I already submit to them through the CONECA arrangement, where varieties are attributed by CONECA experts and graded/slabbed with correct attribution by ICG. Even ANACS is not that accurate, and next to PCGS, their slab is the nicest IMO.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • coinbufcoinbuf Posts: 11,289 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Thay need to learn how to grade. OK really all thay need to do is stop giving out MS/PR70's like thay were candy. I have a gorgous 1897-S Morgan in an ICG holder and it's every bit of the MS65 grade thay assigned. ICG needs to earn the respect of collectors by providing more accurate grading and less hype grading IMO.

    Chris
    My Lincoln Registry
    My Collection of Old Holders

    Never a slave to one plastic brand will I ever be.
  • tsacchtsacch Posts: 2,929 ✭✭✭
    Find Jimmy Hoffa comes to mind, ..........but to be serious...............start being dead on with grading for a long time, and win over more dealers.....and pray that the other top 3 fall from grace.........probably most weight on the last portion of my statement. Jimmy hoffa is probably all toned up now in the barrel of grease he is in on the bottom of the ocean.

    tom
    Family, kids, coins, sports (playing not watching), jet skiing, wakeboarding, Big Air....no one ever got hurt in the air....its the sudden stop that hurts. I hate Hurricane Sandy. I hate FEMA and i hate the blasted insurance companies.
  • braddickbraddick Posts: 23,967 ✭✭✭✭✭
    When one of their Graders gives a Lincoln with slide marks and tics the grade of MS67 or a spotted/hairlined proof clad Kennedy the grade of PR70 DCAM, do you think that Grader knows the grade he is giving is crap and he's following the Company mandate, or is he truly thinking the coin fits the grade he's giving?

    peacockcoins

  • airplanenutairplanenut Posts: 22,148 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>When one of their Graders gives a Lincoln with slide marks and tics the grade of MS67 or a spotted/hairlined proof clad Kennedy the grade of PR70 DCAM, do you think that Grader knows the grade he is giving is crap and he's following the Company mandate, or is he truly thinking the coin fits the grade he's giving? >>

    Either way, the blame is with ICG... they owe it to customers to either be honest and accurate, or hire honest and accurate graders. Failure of either is what's dropped them--I really think their grading of moderns has killed them.

    Jeremy
    JK Coin Photography - eBay Consignments | High Quality Photos | LOW Prices | 20% of Consignment Proceeds Go to Pancreatic Cancer Research
  • BochimanBochiman Posts: 25,377 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Better grading (more consistent at the right level).
    Name brand graders
    Better marketing
    Grade guarantee (I believe it is currently their policy to review/correct a grade if wrong (and they agree it is wrong) but that doesn't do ME (me=consumer) much good if something was bought at PR70DCAM level but majority of dealers/graders really agree it is only PR69DCAM). If that is the case, it isn't worth it to me to send it in for the "correct" grade and I will keep it overgraded at PR70DCAM.......get that part? I will it overgraded at PR70DCAM.....that means I, and others, understand it is overgraded. Until they get out of this overgraded issue, they won't get a lot of the business.
    Grade guarantee has to be $$$ compensated if wrong and admitted to be wrong.
    Better incentives....they have to come in and WANT to take marketshare...they have to WANT to eat PCGS' lunch. If they are happy with the scraps left over, it won't happen

    I've been told I tolerate fools poorly...that may explain things if I have a problem with you. Current ebay items - Nothing at the moment

  • LincolnCentManLincolnCentMan Posts: 5,347 ✭✭✭✭
    I think it's too late, but for starters, they could establish a registry.

    David
  • CardsFanCardsFan Posts: 1,093 ✭✭✭
    I like that you can get the black inserts with their coins. I've never submitted to them but I did buy one cause I thought it looked cool. image
  • ccexccex Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭
    Barring a fall from grace with PCGS, NCG, or ANACS, ICG needs to limit the 66 and better grades it prints to the proportion of these grades found in the aforementioned companies' slabs.

    If they do tghten up grading above 65, they may also need to change their insert, so that collectors can distinguish a new ICG from the ICG we have known. (Think of old green-bordered vs. new gold-bordered PCI slabs).
    "Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by stupidity" - Hanlon's Razor
  • pharmerpharmer Posts: 8,355


    << <i>I like that you can get the black inserts with their coins. I've never submitted to them but I did buy one cause I thought it looked cool. image >>



    Yeah, this makes the point, looks like ticks on the jaw and one on the lower collar. I don't think PCGS would give this a 66. They seem to be implying that since they feel it is 67, standards will change to fit their ideal, but they won't win, and shouldn't try. I too like the black (intercept, right?) insert.
    Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Apropos of the coin posse/aka caca: "The longer he spoke of his honor, the tighter I held to my purse."

    image
  • CardsFanCardsFan Posts: 1,093 ✭✭✭


    << <i>Yeah, this makes the point, looks like ticks on the jaw and one on the lower collar. I don't think PCGS would give this a 66. >>



    Yah, it's definitely not a 67, but I only paid 64 money for it so I was happy. Usually if you just figure 2 points lower when it's ICG you won't get hurt and sometimes you'll get surprised. Their holders are close to being my favorite.
  • relayerrelayer Posts: 10,570

    Back their grades with $$$
    image
    My posts viewed image times
    since 8/1/6
  • If PCGS, NGC, ANACS go out of business and ICG becomes the only game in town, they will still be thought of as number 4. They're like American Motors was to the car industry.

    They need to find a nitch to beef up their reputation. Like become the undisputed graders of early copper or something. I think they did try some sort of alliance with NGE awhile back but that didn't seem to do anything but flood NGE's website with ICG coins. Hasn't SEGS tried something like this with full step nickels?



    Jerry
  • StratStrat Posts: 612 ✭✭✭
    Pat,

    They need to gain respect, plain and simple. Their product is frequently met with jeers and skepticism on the bourse, and it's very difficult, in my experience, to sell ICG graded coins. I agree with this assessment, posted above:



    << <i>If they do tghten up grading above 65, they may also need to change their insert, so that collectors can distinguish a new ICG from the ICG we have known. (Think of old green-bordered vs. new gold-bordered PCI slabs). >>



    They really need to tighten up their grading above the 65 level, I agree. Perhaps a change in holder or label would signify a new, more conservative approach. I like a lot of what ICG does, and the way they handle submissions, through a third party, but it's their grading that counts. I talk to James Taylor whenever I see him at shows, and I think publishing a pop report would help somewhat. Publishing prices in the blue sheet was a positive step, but they need greater market acceptance. That is going to take more conservative grading and time. I am surprised to see they're still in the game, though.

  • TUMUSSTUMUSS Posts: 2,207
    ANY third party grading service could win my business by:

    Accurately and Consistently (as possible) grade ALL coins based on ANA standards.

    (This is the hurdle that most of them will never dare cross...because to do so, they will not reap the benefit(s) of doing so until the market recognizes their consistency - witch could takes many years. This means that they would lose the steady income of those who play the "I'll send this to them to get my PR70DCAM".)

    When the market accepts them as consistent and accurate grader...then the coins in their holders will "hold" there resale value...just as PCGS, NGC, ANACS respectively.

  • BAJJERFANBAJJERFAN Posts: 31,082 ✭✭✭✭✭
    They might be acceptable if they could get their crossover rate at PCGS up to about 75%.
    theknowitalltroll;
  • BigGreekBigGreek Posts: 1,090
    They need to bring their grading standards up to PCGS.
    I've seen too many ICG slabs which were a point short
    of the PCGS equivalent. Perhaps they can change the
    slab design or color to reflect the new standards.
    image
    Please check out my eBay auctions!
    My WLH Short Set Registry Collection
  • jamesfsmjamesfsm Posts: 652 ✭✭
    ICG grades Morgans and medals/tokens accurately. They need to expand this to other areas.

    They DO have "name brand graders" already.
  • dthigpendthigpen Posts: 3,932 ✭✭
    Accurately grade moderns and classics. Back their grades with cash. Grade problem coins and assign a proper net grade to them.
  • image They already have a spot in the marketplace. Heritage has them in their auctions. I find that while occasionally too liberal they frequently are too tight on grades in an effort to gain respectability. I sent them several absolute lock (IMHO) EF Standing Lib quarters and they came back as fines and in one odd case a VG10. I cracked them all and sent them to NGC they came back mostly EF 40's a couple EF45's and a couple VF's. Of course ICG's stated goal is to only slab attractive coins, whatever that means.

    For me... they need to be consistent and most important have a $$$ backed guarantee.
    "Don't bother just to be better than your contemporaries or predecessors. Try to be better than yourself." - William Faulkner
    NoEbayAuctionsForNow
  • ziggy29ziggy29 Posts: 18,668 ✭✭✭
    They need to be more conservative with the MS-66+ grade designations, especially (but not exclusively) with moderns. I think that's where ICG's reputation suffers most. Most people will trust an ICG 63, I think, but not an ICG 68.

    Which is funny, because below that grade, ICG is as consistent and conservative as anyone out there. When I search for AU-58s for potential inclusion in my type set, ICG 58s are almost always among the nicest ones out there and truly fit the description for the grade.
  • Any 3rd party grading service needs to be consistent and have the ability to
    back up their grades. If Accugrade came out with a new holder, new graders,
    strong grading that was agreed on by 95% of the dealers out there, and a
    policy to buy back misgraded coins that worked, I'd start buying Accugrade.
    As it is, any company that gives away PR70's like candy will not get my business.
    Robert Getty - Lifetime project to complete the finest collection of 1872 dated coins.
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,781 ✭✭✭✭
    Change their name to either ANACS, NGC, or PCGS for starters.

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • ShamikaShamika Posts: 18,781 ✭✭✭✭
    Actually, offering me a job as a grader would also help now that I think about it. image

    Buyer and seller of vintage coin boards!
  • Grading more consistently and/or get better looking holders. I can't stand they're holders ugly city. It would also help if they became more public like PCGS and NGC are. They are all over the map. ICG needs to advertise more, get some grading books out, show up at the major shows, get a GOOD website, and they should be set.
    Scott Hopkins
    -YN Currently Collecting & Researching Colonial World Coins, Especially Spanish Coins, With a Great Interest in WWII Militaria.

    My Ebay!
  • dorkkarldorkkarl Posts: 12,691 ✭✭✭
    as someone who has NO slab bias whatosever, i'd say that technically, the icg slab is siginficantly poorer quality then the other 3. they seem to scuff & scratch very easily, & when i look at coins stuck in their plastic, i'd swear the plastic is not clear & distorts the appearance of the coin. so IF i collected coins in slabs, they would have to really improve the poor quality of their holders.

    K S
  • keetskeets Posts: 25,351 ✭✭✭✭✭
    discussing grades is always tricky and with ICG it always comes down to discussing grades. they have certain "positives" such as an attractive holder and the fact that they offer the Intercept Shield holders, but as long as PCGS pretty much tells us all what a certain grade is, ICG and everybody else has to grade to that standard or they'll be criticized. i find it ironic that some will argue that point by saying this or that about NGC/ANACS, yet the comparison always is to PCGS, they set the standard by which we all assess the accuracy of the other services. while the comparison should in fact be to ANA grading standards, PCGS has created their own hobby leading standard.

    obvious mistakes like those mentioned previously aside, until ICG is judged as grading consistently to the PCGS standard, they are doomed to an "also ran" classification.

    al h.image

    image
  • Start a great message board and pay a moderator vast sums of money.

    Forum AdministratorPSA & PSA/DNA ForumModerator@collectors.com | p 800.325.1121 | PSAcard.com

  • dthigpendthigpen Posts: 3,932 ✭✭


    << <i>Start a great message board and pay a moderator vast sums of money. >>

    image
  • ManorcourtmanManorcourtman Posts: 8,023 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I also saw the ad in CW. Although I did not take it seriously I believe I read it and it said $15 per coin for economy which immediately made me throw it away. Maybe for $5 a coin I'd send some stuff to them.....and that would only be for error coins I had doubts about. I got back into the COIN Market about 4 years ago after about a 20 year vacation. I bought several ICG modern MS70 proofs....mostly early 1960's proofs and paid top dollar.....when I realized I made a mistake by buying MS70 Modern ICG coins and tried to sell them I lost about 50% of my valuable initial investment. Hey ICG.....MS70 coins left quite an impression on me and it wasn't good. True MS70 coins are rare although you hand them out like tootsie rolls at Holloween. That's why I won't even look at an ICG coin....modern or classic.....I don't trust them.
  • POP reports would be a positive thing I think.
  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭
    Totally change their standards. In fact, I've always felt there was room at the top end for an extremely conservative grading company (ECGC?) and not one more that overgrades everything and has squat for credibility.

    Plus its always bugged me that their head guy, whose name escapes me, wears that little beanie all the time. I remember when I was a kid I was sitting with my grandmother when some guy walked by in a hat like that. Grandma told me that guys who where hats like that are 'wise-guys', and to this day I believe it. So who the heck wants some wise-guy grading their coins?

    Not me, I tell you.
  • nwcsnwcs Posts: 13,386 ✭✭✭
    To win over my business, ICG would need to equal or surpass the standards and consistency of NGC and PCGS. And then top it off with better customer support and electronic access. That is, to know more than shipment received, grades ready, shipped. But to know what is going on in between. Also they would need a comparable guarantee for their grading. Perhaps an innovative slab concept as well. Maybe even encourage those of us who are developers to write tools to extend their own stuff outside. Like providing web services we could tie into for products. Would make for a nice revenue stream (potential). Those are some initial thoughts.


  • << <i>Totally change their standards. In fact, I've always felt there was room at the top end for an extremely conservative grading company (ECGC?) and not one more that overgrades everything and has squat for credibility.

    Plus its always bugged me that their head guy, whose name escapes me, wears that little beanie all the time. I remember when I was a kid I was sitting with my grandmother when some guy walked by in a hat like that. Grandma told me that guys who where hats like that are 'wise-guys', and to this day I believe it. So who the heck wants some wise-guy grading their coins?

    Not me, I tell you. >>



    It's a white golfing hat, not a beanie. You are talking about James Taylor and James is an extremely nice man.

  • ColonialCoinUnionColonialCoinUnion Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭


    << <i>It's a white golfing hat, not a beanie. You are talking about James Taylor and James is an extremely nice man. >>



    I stand corrected. Its a "white golfing hat".
  • and if he pays moderators huge salaries, I'll wear a "white golfing hat" and with pride!

    Forum AdministratorPSA & PSA/DNA ForumModerator@collectors.com | p 800.325.1121 | PSAcard.com

  • coinkatcoinkat Posts: 23,086 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I have one coin graded by ICG. I like it and I think it was appropriately graded.

    Experience the World through Numismatics...it's more than you can imagine.

  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,336 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Change their holder at the same time they tighten their grading standards for US coins. They already do a decent job on ancients.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • ICG already has my respect and business because they are usually #1 in consistent grading results for sight unseen bids per the Greysheet. Read your Greysheet (Coin Dealer Newsletter) front page more closely and you'll notice that ICG consistently ranks #1 or #2 in the statistical (non-emotional) analysis. I am more likely to buy an ICG coin. Plus, a week long Ebay On Line Poll, last year, had ICG ranked #1 for grading accuracy by the ebay coin participants.
    Just because they don't grade the huge number of coins like the equally and deservingly respected PCGS or NGC doesn't mean they have a problem with me. It's not a popularity contest to me! Many collectors and dealers probably don't know that to remain independent they do not allow any ownership by mega coin dealers (or any coin dealers for that fact) like NGC & PCGS do. So, they don't get that enormous boost of coin supply to grade that is provided by the mega dealers/owners. All submitted coins to ICG go to a third party first so the graders have no idea who the submitter is and there is "no pressure to perform." Three different graders look at the same coin. All this is guaranteed and warranted in their contract. That's strong independent protection. I really appreciate the way they operate and their ethics. What do they need? Better marketing/advertising to explain what I just told you by reading the warranty. Their advertising lacks the very reasoning I explained. They could probably use a respected "spokesman" known in the coin community but that could be too costly.
    Satisfaction lies in the effort, not in the attainment. Full effort is full victory. -Gandhi
  • 291fifth291fifth Posts: 24,336 ✭✭✭✭✭


    << <i>as someone who has NO slab bias whatosever, i'd say that technically, the icg slab is siginficantly poorer quality then the other 3. they seem to scuff & scratch very easily, & when i look at coins stuck in their plastic, i'd swear the plastic is not clear & distorts the appearance of the coin. so IF i collected coins in slabs, they would have to really improve the poor quality of their holders.

    K S >>



    I've also noted that the quality of the plastic in their holders seems sub-par when compared to other brands. There always seem to be slight mars that won't polish out no matter how hard one tries.
    All glory is fleeting.
  • To address the criticism of ICG grading so many modern coins and Eagles high like MS 67 & MS 68 etc. isn't that what the U.S. Mint truly intends to make? Modern coin making, more expensive dies and superior minting equipment tends to do that to a coin doesn't it? Do you really expect the proof sets and state quarters to come out looking like they used the equipment of 40 years ago? I don't see how it is ICG's fault if the Mint is producing superior strikes and takes extra special care to not bang coins around in bags during the process of getting them to the Federal Reserve?
    Satisfaction lies in the effort, not in the attainment. Full effort is full victory. -Gandhi
  • I've said this a few times. The 3rd party graders that are out of flavor need to change their image by

    1) Changing to a new slab. ANY type will do.....
    2) Market the change.
    3) With the new marketing campaign, introduce new tighter grding standards.

    It's that simple..... Really......

    Companies like this need to change their perception out in the market. They'll NEVER do it keeping their same slab. Heck, just change the color.....

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file