Topps TIFFANY???
ajmoeller81
Posts: 258
Can someone explain to me the difference between Topps and Topps Tiffany? The cards look the same to me so I can't figure out how to distinguish between the two. What's the history behind this Tiffany variety and why did Topps name one of their products after a jewelry brand?
0
Comments
James
Topps has never branded any of its cards "TIFFANY". Topps simply names these cards Special Edition Glossy.
These cards have high gloss on the fronts and are printed on heavy white card stock. Other than that, they look exactly the same as regular Topps cards.
Topps only released these cards in full sets near the end of the year. Limited production, expecially when compared to the regular issue.
1987 had the most sets printed. I think 1989 or 1990 is the rarest of all "Tiffany" sets.
your friend
Mike
bobsbbcards SGC Registry Sets
<< <i> '84 and '85 had 10,000 >>
Bob
The 04 Standard Catalog of BB Cards has the 85T Tiffany at 5,000 sets. Which source are you using?
your friend
Mike
David
WhosYourVladdy
I collect 1977 Topps Baseball PSA 9
60's and 70's Baseball HOFers PSA 8 or better
The 04 Standard Catalog states to multiply star cards by 4 to attain value.
your friend
Mike
(these number apply to both standard set and traded set)
1984: 10,000
1985: 5,000
1986: 5,000
1987: 30,000
1988: 25,000
1989: 15,000
1990: 15,000
1991: no production numbers given, but estimates 30x value compared to regular issue
<< <i>The 04 Standard Catalog of BB Cards has the 85T Tiffany at 5,000 sets. >>
When I say that '85 had 10,000 sets, what I'm implying is that it had 10,000 sets divided by 2. Wasn't that obvious?
bobsbbcards SGC Registry Sets
I would be interested in a 1991 Toppd Traded Tiffany #108T-Paul Shuey.
2005 Origins Old Judge Brown #/20 and Black 1/1s, 2000 Ultimate Victory Gold #/25
2004 UD Legends Bake McBride autos & parallels, and 1974 Topps #601 PSA 9
Rare Grady Sizemore parallels, printing plates, autographs
Nothing on ebay
Thanks.
James
Thanks
Is it still available, or did you decide to sell to him?