Grade this raw morgan please?

cary1952

Lustre is terrific! obv and reverse taken with different scanners, hence, the color difference. I am trying out various scanners.

EvilMCT

Jumped the gun, sorry.

Ken

Louis

Nice, if the luster is there I would say 65.

kieferscoins

We need a reverse picture in order to grade a coin.

Cameron Kiefer

Louis

<< <i>We need a reverse picture in order to grade a coin.

Cameron Kiefer >>




Cameron is right.

I jumped the gun too.

cary1952

lustre is terrific, no problem there at all!

kieferscoins

MS-65.

Cameron Kiefer

BigGreek

I think 64, at least. I can see it in a 65 holder.

rhedden

Strike is a touch soft for 65, but the surfaces are nearly mark-free. Is it in a slab already?

cary1952

no it is not in a slab yet.

kieferscoins

You should send it in! It is a nice coin.

Cameron Kiefer

GoYankees

MS64

anablep

I like its "look." Nice coin; I'd say 65.

numonebuyer

It is a little weak in the strike, but clean fields and devices. MS-64.

poorguy

Typical New Orleans reverse and mushy strike. MS64-65.

Steve27

Weak strike, but nice umarked coin, MS65.

JeffinMich

It's gotta be better than a 64.

wam98

I'll have to say 64 on this one because of strike and a couple luster breaks on the cheak and in the field in front of the face. Great looking Morgan overall IMO.

coppercoins

Looks like a 65 to me..

ER

65

Poppy

Its an ms 65 the 0 mints are most often weak strikes. Very nice coin.

coinbuf

Looks reak nice, those rim nicks and the slight grazes in the fields might keep it in the 64 range but would'nt look out of place in a 65.

Chris