Which would you rather have?

ScarsdaleCoin

Here is an interesting thought.....apply the coin to what ever you want....but .....

Would you rather have (lets say all in pcgs holder)

PRDC 64
PRCA 65
PR 67

interesting isnt it?

mgoodm3

65 CAM

GoYankees

64DCAM

haletj

How about 64FS or ms65 (or ms66) for Jeffs?
66FB or ms67 for Roosies?
64FBL or ms65 (or ms66) for Franklins?

ms70

None. I don't collect proofs!

ziggy29

Assuming they are all worth the same amount, I think it might depend on the series.

Betta285

65CA

jim

nwcs

64DC

kieferscoins

Depends on the coin series.

Cameron Kiefer

Cladiator

PRDC 64

MrEureka

PR 67. Hell, I'd rather have a PR 66 than a 64 DCAM.

tradedollarnut

It really depends on the coin ... but in general I'd take the PR67.

XpipedreamR

67



Cameo is nice, but it doesn't thrill me.

MyWorldCoinTypeSet

PR67, no question aout it.

coinguy89

I like cameo on the older coins and the newer coins better have deep cameo.

100proof1957

PR68 CAM !

REGISTRY

CarlWohlforth

I like proofs best and enjoy the cameo contrast. I'd go for the deep cameo.

A few years ago when PCGS just started giving out the cameo designation for classic proofs you could buy cameos for no premium. I remember several dealers saying that most proofs from the 1800s were cameo. But they aren't and few are deep cameo. Anyway I did buy a few cameos in older holders and had them re-labeled with the cameo designation added.

CharlesDarwin

In general...the grade 64 bothers me. And a CAM coin just isn't good enough. And since I'm all about business strike moderns...I'd definately LOVE the MS67.

CD

RGT

The one with the lowest population.

I think I would like the looks of the 67 best. I don't mind a 64 in an MS coin, but a PR64 can look pretty marked up.