You Guys were Correct! I Was Wrong on This One.
braddick
Posts: 23,963 ✭✭✭✭✭
About three weeks ago I had a thread running regarding a raw, what appeared to be a GEM, Franklin half. It had neat color, but was questionable. I thought it had a shot with ANACS, but when I featured it here I believe everyone stated, and with valid reasoning, it was AT.
Well, sure enough, I got the Franklin back earlier in the week and they NET graded it due to the color.
Here it is:
Edited to add: You guys called it. ANACS confirmed it. Oh well! (I still think it's pretty.)
Well, sure enough, I got the Franklin back earlier in the week and they NET graded it due to the color.
Here it is:
Edited to add: You guys called it. ANACS confirmed it. Oh well! (I still think it's pretty.)
peacockcoins
0
Comments
Cameron Kiefer
42/92
<< <i>Is it really that green? >>
Honestly, it is. That shade of green- like that on some Morgan dollars- is what attracted me to the coin. I believe the obverse is too speckley (I know that's not a real word) toned for ANACS. I have seen the same type of color on some Commemoratives in SEGS holders, although that's not really supporting my argument!
peacockcoins
K S