Home U.S. Coin Forum

Are Early Commemoratives considered semi-modern coins?

BigEBigE Posts: 6,949 ✭✭✭
This is somewhat related to cionguy's post about the 39 nickel. Some people refer to Early commems. as "classic commems" . Do you think they are classic coins, modern or semi-modern? Or are they a mix (Lafayette and Isabella)?-------------------BigE
I'm glad I am a Tree

Comments

  • Isn't "classic commems" is the "market acceptable" termimage
  • BillJonesBillJones Posts: 33,959 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I view the Booker T. Washington and the Washington-Carver pieces as modern coins. Booker T. Washington and George Washington Carver where great Americans who deserved to honored on commemorative coins. But the way that the coins were issued year after year for no good reason is the same garbage that ruined the commemorative coin market in the late 1930s. It was abuse, plain and simple.

    The Iowa might be sort of the same situation, but at least the Iowa folks did not try to rip off collectors with their coin. They sold them when they could, actually did set aside a small group of them for sale many years later, but overall they did not treat collectors that way some other commemorative coin commissions did.
    Retired dealer and avid collector of U.S. type coins, 19th century presidential campaign medalets and selected medals. In recent years I have been working on a set of British coins - at least one coin from each king or queen who issued pieces that are collectible. I am also collecting at least one coin for each Roman emperor from Julius Caesar to ... ?

Leave a Comment

BoldItalicStrikethroughOrdered listUnordered list
Emoji
Image
Align leftAlign centerAlign rightToggle HTML viewToggle full pageToggle lights
Drop image/file