What cost $10 in 1859 would cost $202.96 in 2003. Also, if you were to buy exactly the same products in 2003 and 1859, they would cost you $10 and $0.49 respectively.
Yeh but you have to spend money, so that $3.50 is going to really be 7 bust halves. I guess you could raound up all the cleaned and tooled ones and go spend them.
Adjusting for average inflation isn't accurate. It has to be adjusted by year as well as for the wealth explosion in the US. Not to mention the currency controls the government exercised then are very different from today. I'd say its real cost at that time was more than the $300 of today.
I had a good time tooling through those colonials prices -
A Washington Small Eagle cent, one of the most common colonials around today particularly in high grade, was shown for 2 times the price of a Higley back then.
I found this to be an interesting statement that shows that nothing has changed:
Allowance must be made, in some cases, as to the condition of the coins sold; as, for instance, what one may call "uncirculated," others would only denominate as fine, or very good.
To echo K S's sentiment's: As usual, the Best (PCGS), continues to come up with idea's such as this to "Stay On Top". Great Job PCGS. Lee
P.S.: Just need to "Tweak" submission turnaround times to stay on Top though. But seems to be getting better, of late. Besides consistency in Grading, PCGS #1 concern IMO. As a business grows, so should it's workforce, to stay competitive in any marketplace.
Comments
Cameron Kiefer
<< <i>$10 was a bunch of money in 1859! >>
Adjusted for inflation, it's still less than $300.
<< <i>
<< <i>$10 was a bunch of money in 1859! >>
Adjusted for inflation, it's still less than $300. >>
I don't believe that's accurate.
peacockcoins
What cost $10 in 1859 would cost $202.96 in 2003.
Also, if you were to buy exactly the same products in 2003 and 1859,
they would cost you $10 and $0.49 respectively.
<< <i>I don't believe that's accurate. >>
Well, this site claims it's $217, though I can't vouch for its accuracy. I thought that seemed low, so I went up to $300.
In any event, it's surely nowhere *close* to $20,000 or more which is what this coin will cost today.
I need a time machine!!!
Dennis
Like VOC Numismatics on facebook
<< <i>$3.50 for a 1850 3 cent pattern!!!
I need a time machine!!!
Dennis >>
Yeh but you have to spend money, so that $3.50 is going to really be 7 bust halves. I guess you could raound up all the cleaned and tooled ones and go spend them.
well done pcgs!!!
K S
A Washington Small Eagle cent, one of the most common colonials around today particularly in high grade, was shown for 2 times the price of a Higley back then.
Allowance must be made, in some cases, as to the condition of the coins sold; as, for instance, what one may call "uncirculated," others would only denominate as fine, or very good.
Talk about swings in grade!!!
P.S.: Just need to "Tweak" submission turnaround times to stay on Top though. But seems to be getting better, of late. Besides consistency in Grading, PCGS #1 concern IMO. As a business grows, so should it's workforce, to stay competitive in any marketplace.
Don't know about inflation but if compounded at 5% for 145 years it is now $11,815.40
<< <i>"Adjusted for inflation, it's still less than $300." Don't know about inflation but if compounded at 5% for 145 years it is now $11,815.40
There you go. That's a more realistic value on the $10. of 1859.
Remember too to look at salary then vs now.
peacockcoins
I second that! Look forward to seeing this when it gets rolling, great idea.
San Diego, CA
<< <i>Great idea. Notice how the price of the 1856 FE cent dropped from $2 to $1 in 1859. That was due to the Mint restriking them (proofs). >>
Can I have one for $1? You'll be my best friend
michael