Options
Do die cracks help, hurt, or have no effect on value?
Longacre
Posts: 16,717 ✭✭✭
I would assume that die cracks are just indicative of a late die state and have no impact on a coin's value. Does anyone have any opinions? Thanks.
Always took candy from strangers
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
Didn't wanna get me no trade
Never want to be like papa
Working for the boss every night and day
--"Happy", by the Rolling Stones (1972)
0
Comments
"Bongo hurtles along the rain soaked highway of life on underinflated bald retread tires."
~Wayne
<< <i>Do die cracks help, hurt, or have no effect on value?
>>
Yes.
They generally have little or no effect on price but they do have an effect on many
collectors. People value coins differently and some will see them as a distraction
while others will see them as extra bang for the buck. This can affect the price a
little in some cases if potential buyers tend to walk on by but can result in a higher
price if a collector has to have it because of the die crack.
quite often, a die state is attributed based on how advanced die-cracks are, etc.
do not confuse the significance of the 2 terms. generally, a die-crack has no significant on value, unless it's an attribution determinant.
K S
I think it matters just to the individual collector. I personally love a real interesting die crack on an old coin.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
There are some interesting cracks that will add a little something to
the value, such as San Francisco War nickels with a crack running
right through that big ol' S turning it into a $.
Ken
Edited to add: Don't forget what it did for the value of the PMM quarter!
Generally the die state (known as prime) of a bust half dollar exhibits no cracks. Important variations (die states) of the same die marriage will sometimes develop significant die cracks and be worth more or less because of scarcity.
For example, an 1808 Overton-104 half dollar is a rarity 2 coin. The same die marriage with a die crack from star 6 to Liberty's head is known as 1808 Overton 104a. It was once classified as a rarity 3 coin but is now a rarity 5 coin. It is more "valuable" than the Overton-104 die state.
Conversely, an 1808 Overton-102 is a rarity 5 coin. The obverse has no die cracks. It is a much sought after coin.
The same die marriage, 1808 Overton-102a has a distinct die crack running through the date up to Liberty's ribbon. It is a rarity 2 coin. It is less "valuable" than the 1808 Overton-102.
All things being equal (such as rarity) for a given date and Overton variety, many bust half collectors prefer the prime die state which looks sharper.
I think most collectors prefer the early die state of most coins in any series over a later die state. For specialists this can be an entirely different story.
For those who collect die states of die varieties of early U.S. coinage, die breaks or the absence of them, can raise or lower the desirability of a specific coin.
For type collectors, die breaks can be indicators of less than perfect strikes. Since type collectors usually want the sharpest examples of a given design, late die states can be something that they would avoid. Ditto for some date and mint collectors.
Here’s an example. One of the key dates in the Indian Cent series is the 1872. Those who have had a lot of experience with this date will recall that some coins of are weakly stuck on the shield at the top of the reverse. After looking a number of pieces, I learned the cause of this when I was able to examine a choice Mint State example. I noted a series of very small die breaks within the “United States of America” on the obverse. As a result the corresponding areas on the reverse, including the shield are weakly struck. I can tell you from experience that such coins are harder to sell than the sharply struck examples.
Don’t get me wrong. Die breaks can add interest to a given coin. AND they can be diagnostic markers for very scarce die varieties and certification of some very rare dates. For example advanced Morgan Dollar collectors are well aware of the die break or die mark that appears on all genuine 1893-S dollars (most commonly noted on the “T” in “LIBERTY.”)
As you can see blanket statements concerning die breaks are really impossible to make.
Free Trial
<< <i> In the case of the following, the distinctive die cracks on the reverse attribute the coin as an ex-Reece (board member) specimen >>
How can you use die cracks to attribute a coin to a specific collection when every coin struck from that die after the cracks formed will show the same die crack pattern? I also have an 1843-O $10 with the same die crack pattern as the one you illustrated.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
<< <i>Barndog - dead thread resuscitator. >>
I think there is a tremendous amount of value in these supposedly "dead" threads that can do so many things for us: further our knowledge of general and specific subjects in numismatics, encourage us to pursue further research on our own, and remind people that the USCF is an incredibly valuable research tool.
So yes, guilty.
Worry is the interest you pay on a debt you may not owe.
<< <i>Is it possible to have a perfect MS70 or PF70 coin that shows a die crack? >>
There's an inconclusive (I think) discussion on this topic HERE
But it has a gee-golly cool factor for me, since I just discovered my first die-crack accidentally only yesterday. I put the little freebie magnifier I got with my 1st order over some Morgans, and lo, there on the reverse of an 1899-O was a little silver thread arcing from the O thru the star and across all the UNITED. It was nice to know what that feature came from. It's subtle but it has a nice symmetry to it, and I can see it now without the magnifier. And all that was prompted by a thread I read here at the time...Cool forum...Thanks, guys and gals!
Anyway, this is going OT, but can anyone steer me to a resource about 1899-O Morgan die varieties?
If the crack(s) are part of a late die state that's significantly rarer than the non-cracked, it generally warrants a premium among specialists, particularly if the cracks are dramatic or result in chips or cuds.
(*yes I know the SB is a die gouge or scratch and not a crack but you get the point)
Liberty: Parent of Science & Industry
Interesting question, but one might also ask "Is it possible to have an MS-70 or PF-70 coin that does not exhibit a die crack?
What I mean by that is this. In my ongoing die state studies of Capped Bust half dimes, I have had several opportunities to closely examine very high MS grade examples of half dimes, under the microscope, to determine their place in the emission sequence, or perhaps to determine the existence of another remarriage. When studying such high grade specimens, under high magnification, I am continually amazed at the presence of a myriad of tiny little die cracks, often appearing like a spider web across the surface of the coin. These die cracks are typically very tiny and delicate, and would not be visible on even high AU grade specimens, as they would have worn away in even light circulation. Many/most of these tiny die cracks are not mentioned in the available literature, as they were likely never seen by the authors. It gave me a whole new perspective on the subject of die cracks. We tend to think of die cracks as an infrequent phenomenon, and usually catastrophic to the die, eventually leading to its removal from service. But I have learned that die steel cracks with much greater frequency than I had imagined, although most die cracks never progress to a point where they become visible on even lightly circulated coins, and even fewer grow to a size that would warrant a discontinuation of use of the die. Generally, it appears that the higher the grade of the coin, under high magnification, the greater the number of die cracks that become visible. Remember that all coins began life as uncirculated, so presumably all would exhibit these tiny die cracks.
Perhaps not what you meant by your question, but I thought it was appropriate to inject this observation into the discussion.
Personally, I like die cracks, they make the coin more interesting, but a lot of people don't, so while I might be willing to go a little more on a coin with die cracks, there are many who would prefer not.
The most interesting ones are listed here on www.vamworld.com
Free Trial
<< <i>How can you use die cracks to attribute a coin to a specific collection when every coin struck from that die after the cracks formed will show the same die crack pattern? >>
this is not a general rule, but die-cracks are progressive, so 2 coins may have a particular diecrack the same, but 1 coin in a later die-state may have developed an additional crack. for a scarce issue where die cracks abound, combine that w/ condition & you have to factors that may very much narrow down the population of comparable coins
<< <i> Is it possible to have a perfect MS70 or PF70 coin that shows a die crack? >>
no, since 70 is a imaginary grade anyhow. but it takes a good die to produce a good strike to produce a good coin, so a broken die can automatically can only produce coins of inferior quality, hence the effect of die deterioration on strike should be taken into account in grading high-end coins
K S
ps i think many vams have nothing to do w/ die-cracks, in case you were unaware of that