POLL: PCGS and NGC holders
MrEureka
Posts: 24,252 ✭✭✭✭✭
I think a set of coins looks much better when it's housed in a single company's holders. When the set contains assorted types of slabs, it doesn't even look like a "set" to me. Even though it's seems pure fantasy, I wonder if I'm the only one that would like to see all TPG's use the same slab format.
What do you think?
What do you think?
Andy Lustig
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
0
Comments
Yeah I know I'm dreaming.
******
<< <i>I agree. Don't have to be exactly identical but close enough that they fit the same box & line up ½ way decent in rows when you lay your collection out on the table. >>
Actually, the NGC boxes fit NGC and PCGS holders nicely and securely. (Maybe not the old PCGS rattlers, though -- I haven't checked that.) I have most of my type set (split between PCGS and NGC holders) in a silver NGC box. They all fit nicely.
Also, the Eagle certified coin albums display them together nicely. I had to buy some when I bought the 1877 and 1914-D cents, since I wouldn't buy those raw and I wanted to be able to display the whole collection together. To be able to display everything together I had to get some Eagle albums and some of those Coin World holders for the raw coins. Still, it looks odd having some clear slabs (PCGS), some white ones (NGC) and some dark green ones (CW).
themselves visually, it just isn't going to happen.
PCGS coins fit just fine in NGC boxes - I use them almost exclusively.
[ADV] We made individual shells for PCGS/NGC coins that have the same outer
dimensions in order to be able to load both types into our showcases. [/ADV]
Ken
Cameron Kiefer
I think the NCS slabs look better than the NGC ones.
Great transactions with oih82w8, JasonGaming, Moose1913.
I don't think it will ever happen, but "standard" sizing would be nice. I don't care if they look different (i.e. clear vs. white vs. green)
Ken -
A few questions about the shells:
1. Are the slabs recessed in the shells so that they are less likely to get scratched?
2. What are the shells made from?
3. How about showing us a picture of a mix of PCGS and NGC slabs in your shells? I'd like to see if that helps.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Cameron - Aren't the dumb people going to find a way to lose their money anyway?
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>Cameron - Aren't the dumb people going to find a way to lose their money anyway? >>
Yes of course. But companies want to be unique and be able to be told apart from another company. Whats the point of them being just like the guy next door?
Cameron Kiefer
Look at the Poll results. Collectors WANT more standardization.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Cameron Kiefer
Talk to me after hundreds of people respond to the poll.
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
Cameron Kiefer
Doggedly collecting coins of the Central American Republic.
Visit the Society of US Pattern Collectors at USPatterns.com.
<< <i>Because there are no regulatory agencies or consumer pressure to force industry consensus. In fact, the coin industry resists almost every attempt at regulating itself or standardizing anything. >>
One of the best [but not the only] collectible coins IMO is the Morgan dollar which with the exception of the 1921 has not been made in 100 years. So how can some regulatory agency realistically set standards for something that was made that long ago? Since no two Morgans are exactly alike how would you define a standard MS64?
A few questions about the shells:
1. Are the slabs recessed in the shells so that they are less likely to get scratched?
Yes, the slabs are recessed a little over 1/16th of an inch.
2. What are the shells made from?
They are injection-molded black ABS plastic.
3. How about showing us a picture of a mix of PCGS and NGC slabs in your shells? I'd like to see if that helps.
Sure!
These photos are not great, but you'll get the idea.
Each shell is a two-piece part that sandwiches around the slab.
PCGS is on the left, NGC on the right.
Now, with coins inserted. The step at the top and bottom
of the shell allows it to be locked into a channel to hold the
two shell halves together.
Here you can see how the slabs are recessed.
The shells are now locked into our high-strength aluminum
frame to form a panel, using ultra-secure hardware unique
to our showcases.
The entire panel is locked into the wooden frame, and can
be rotated 360 degrees (kids love this).
Our full-frame model lying flat on a table-top with a mixture
of PCGS and NGC coins.
Ken
<< <i>No. I like the slabs different. I suspect the grading standards are slightly different. I like to be able to easily see which slab a coin is in just by looking at a cropped photo. >>
That's a good point Carl. A cropped photo is sometimes all we get when internet shopping.....
Paul
NGC slabs should fit in a PCGS box
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
<< <i>If they used similar slabs, might as well merge the companies. >>
I'm beginning to think that would solve a bunch of problems.
Jerry
Jerry
<< <i>NGC slabs should fit in a PCGS box >>
NGC slabs are a bit longer than PCGS slabs. I don't have a PCGS box, but I imagine the PCGS slabs fit snugly. Why should PCGS change this just to accommodate NGC slabs?
<< <i>
<< <i>If they used similar slabs, might as well merge the companies. >>
I'm beginning to think that would solve a bunch of problems. >>
It probably would but consumer choice is a GOOD thing.