<< <i>There is absolutely nothing wrong with selling original packaging. I have done so myself (this is not my lot). Don't be so quick to suggest fraud. >>
I can understand honest, legitimate reasons why someone would *sell* this item and deliver it as described. I just can't think of many honest, legitimate reasons to pay $50 for it.
(1) Might be cheaper to buy the 1999 proof coins without the box plus paying $50 for the box than buying the original full assembly.
(2) The buyer had no choice. Might have had a damaged box or needed a box for his 1999 proof set in which he did not have one or can't find it. If he paid the US Mint original price for the set and then needs a box what is another $50 when the current price is so much higher?
(3) Fear of even higher prices later on.
Personally, I think it is nuts. But we are nuts, arent we?
<< <i>There is absolutely nothing wrong with selling original packaging. I have done so myself (this is not my lot). Don't be so quick to suggest fraud. >>
I can understand honest, legitimate reasons why someone would *sell* this item and deliver it as described. I just can't think of many honest, legitimate reasons to pay $50 for it. >>
I did not mean on the seller part, He indicates that there are no coins. But what really concerned me is the buyer. What use he will have for empty box.
Simply put, it is much easier to sell, and you will get a better price for your 1999 silver set if you have the box and COA that go with it. And yes there is a good chance that the difference in selling price between a no box set and a with box set is more than $50. Yes, fraud is a possibility, but it can also be legitimite.
I haven't seen the box yet but if it's pristine I'll have to notify a recent customer who seemed to be more concerned with the condition of the box than the contents.
Hey "O", I'm dead serious. Check my recent feedback. This nincompoop was contemplating negging me because the box wasn't perfect. I still have his email. What an idiot!...........Outcome, a positive with a swipe and a "pleasantry" from me. Blocked bidder!
Speaking as someone who opened my 1983 Proof Set and discovered a badly cracked casing, I could think of a legitimate reason to buy that slab. As it was, I ended up taking the coins out and using them as bonus coins for my buyers. If I had seen an auction like this one for the 1999 (at a reasonable price) I would have purchased it and put the coins into the new slab. That certainly isn't a fraudulent reason to purchase.
Education...the key to collector success! ANA#R216999 WINS#482 EAC#5255 CONECA#N-3902 Coin Community Forum
I sell empty boxes on e-bay too, so recently I asked one the winners what they use the boxes for and this was his response: "I use the one`s I think that might have to be replaced, if my Boxes has a scratch, or tear on the Box. Otherwise, a friend of mine, is a Coin Dealer, and I sell them to him, as he buys, and sells everything, sometimes he buys Proof Sets, without the Boxes, and the Coa."
It is definitely financially feasible, but questionably ethical. There are many people who use acetone to clean fingerprints or other debris from their proof coins. Oftentimes, this only works temporarily and the fingerprints or whatever begin to show again. How could you be sure that any individual proof coins that you purchased to go into this packaging would not end up with this problem? You could be selling a fraud set with the best intentions. I wouldn't take the chance.
Education...the key to collector success! ANA#R216999 WINS#482 EAC#5255 CONECA#N-3902 Coin Community Forum
I have a ton of boxes that I really do not want to just throw away. Maybe someone may need them becuase thiers is all beat up or just missing and would like the full product. But yes, $50 for one is a little high. But, he may not care as the person may want to sell the set as a whole deal.
I was just going to mention what has happened to me in the past, but susanlynne beat me to it - the mint occasionally sends boxes that are bent, crushed, marked, or have cracked lens. I too have had buyers send sets back not because of problems with the coins, but because he was a "serious" collector, and the box was not "presentable"...it had been crushed just a bit on the corner during shipment from the mint. Rather than argue, it's easier to have some extra boxes (and preferably lenses, too) sitting around for the times you get those damaged sets from the mint. But I won't pay $50 for one!
Don't you know that it's worth every treasure on Earth to be young at heart? And as rich as you are, it's much better by far, to be young at heart!
Comments
He has sold lots of coin supplies at reasonable prices in the past and I have bought some of them as well.
I am sure even he was shocked at the price the empty 1999 silver proof box attained.
Glad I bought my 1999 silver proof sets from the US Mint. I never expected the current prices either!
<< <i>Why someone wants to buy a box without the coins other than fraud. >>
There is absolutely nothing wrong with selling original packaging. I have done so myself (this is not my lot). Don't be so quick to suggest fraud.
<< <i>There is absolutely nothing wrong with selling original packaging. I have done so myself (this is not my lot). Don't be so quick to suggest fraud. >>
I can understand honest, legitimate reasons why someone would *sell* this item and deliver it as described. I just can't think of many honest, legitimate reasons to pay $50 for it.
(1) Might be cheaper to buy the 1999 proof coins without the box plus paying $50 for the box than buying the original full assembly.
(2) The buyer had no choice. Might have had a damaged box or needed a box for his 1999 proof set in which he did not have one or can't find it. If he paid the US Mint original price for the set and then needs a box what is another $50 when the current price is so much higher?
(3) Fear of even higher prices later on.
Personally, I think it is nuts. But we are nuts, arent we?
<< <i>
<< <i>There is absolutely nothing wrong with selling original packaging. I have done so myself (this is not my lot). Don't be so quick to suggest fraud. >>
I can understand honest, legitimate reasons why someone would *sell* this item and deliver it as described. I just can't think of many honest, legitimate reasons to pay $50 for it. >>
I did not mean on the seller part, He indicates that there are no coins.
But what really concerned me is the buyer. What use he will have for empty box.
Sorry if I offended anybody.
I doubt the casual collector would.
The mint packaging is not sealed, so imagine this scenario...
$48 1999 Silver Proof set packaging + $60 1999 Clad Proof Set coins = $250 1999 "Silver" Proof Set
This would make me nervous if I were looking to buy 1999 silver sets on ebay.
ANA#R216999
WINS#482
EAC#5255
CONECA#N-3902
Coin Community Forum
"I use the one`s I think that might have to be replaced, if my Boxes has a
scratch, or tear on the Box. Otherwise, a friend of mine, is a Coin Dealer, and
I sell them to him, as he buys, and sells everything, sometimes he buys Proof
Sets, without the Boxes, and the Coa."
Just a thought---
ANA#R216999
WINS#482
EAC#5255
CONECA#N-3902
Coin Community Forum
every treasure on Earth
to be young at heart?
And as rich as you are,
it's much better by far,
to be young at heart!
<< <i>$48 1999 Silver Proof set packaging + $60 1999 Clad Proof Set coins = $250 1999 "Silver" Proof Set >>
That does happen.
<< <i>Just the box for $48??? >>
Sold at $68.75 (19 bids).
That SGS guy can sell sand to a Bedouin.
Photos of the 2006 Boston Massacre