Fluorescent or Incandescent for Snapping Coin Pics?
ChuckC
Posts: 1,600
It seems that regular 60 watt light makes coins look too golden. I've had luck with fluorescent basement light, but it's not bright enough. Any solutions?
0
Comments
10-4,
My Instagram picturesErik
My registry sets
My best pictures to date (recently posted SLQ thread) are using Soft White 40's at about 12" from the coin, at about 10 and 2 o'clock. I also have an AutoCorrect feature, which remores the last bit of the yellow.
“We are only their care-takers,” he posed, “if we take good care of them, then centuries from now they may still be here … ”
Todd - BHNC #242
I would suggest NEITHER incan or, most certainly NOT, fluorescent. I use OTT or some other natural light...maybe sunlight if you can.
1) Fluorescent does let the toning come thru but you can't get luster to show....as evidenced by any scanned coin picture you see.
2) Incancescent bulbs give good shots of luster but the toning looks nowhere near what it should. They have too high of a color temp. Too red as it were.
If you want to spend a bit for an OTT (which is what I do) or you can go cheap and just use the sun.
jom
It also helps in some cases to use difuse lighting, for example when you are photographing DMPL dollars and cameo proofs.
WNC Coins, LLC
1987-C Hendersonville Road
Asheville, NC 28803
wnccoins.com
I use the best light around - sunlight
My posts viewed times
since 8/1/6
before (fluorescent):
PM FOR PHOTO
after (one incandescent on either side w/ white balance):
PM FOR PHOTO
GE Reveal bulbs tend to bring out the violets
<< <i>It seems that regular 60 watt light makes coins look too golden. I've had luck with fluorescent basement light, but it's not bright enough. Any solutions? >>
White balance adjustment.
Your original is below. This is the difference that color correction in Photoshop can make. Although I spent about 30 seconds on it.
Like Jom I mostly use Ott lamps when I can't use natural light. However I think Ott lights *are* a kind of fluorescent lights. There are many kinds of fluorescent lights, warm, cool, plant and so forth. There are also many kinds of incandescent lights including reveal bulbs.
Ott lights make my coins too blue while reveal bulbs make my coins too red. I haven't mastered the white color balance thing on my camera so I'm not that flexible. Indirect natural light varies greatly, it can be blue or green depending on if it is reflecting from the sky or trees/landscaping or whatever.
My advice is to experiment with many kinds of lighting. When using artificial lights I suggest blocking all natural light as that has an effect on the results.
Mike
idocoins
<< <i>Like Jom I mostly use Ott lamps when I can't use natural light. However I think Ott lights *are* a kind of fluorescent lights >>
Yes they are but for some reason the type I use (Swirl) allows the luster to show very well....as opposed to other fluorescent bulbs such as in scanners.
jom
OTT lamps are available. But they also make screw in bulbs that can work in regular desk lamps. I think those are the "Swirl Bulbs" Jom uses.
<< <i>I think those are the "Swirl Bulbs" Jom uses >>
Yup. For some reason the OTT lamps that are the tube-type don't work as well for me. I've never really been able to understand why. BTW, the tube kind come with their own "lamp" so to speak.
Here is where I got mine...although recently they were out of stock.
Here
Another
Another
Yes...they are expensive.
jom