MCCS 1962 Franklin PR69 DCAM

LeeG

Before I knew anything about Grading, still don't know shat, or about TPG's, I picked this up. Is it worth cracking out or crossing? Let the "Bashing" begin. It's ok though. I didn't do my research, like many others don't, and jumped right in to coin collecting. So I'm willing to take my lumps. Thanks, Lee

MadMarty

CAM maybe.

kieferscoins

PF67CAM if you are lucky.

Cameron Kiefer

Russ

<< <i>Is it worth cracking out or crossing? >>



No. Not even a cameo.

Russ, NCNE

LeeG

Thanks All. Cameron, nice lady! Lee

kieferscoins

Thanks Can you take better pics of the coin? Thats where the Cameo looks weak (on the bell).

Cameron Kiefer

lordmarcovan

<< <i>PF67CAM if you are lucky. >>



I must agree with Sheriff Sample Slob. The best you could hope for (on a good day) is a 67, and it's borderline CAM... might go, might not.

PR69? DCAM? Fuhgeddaboutit.


I won't berate you for the mistake, as we all have made some.






But let me draw your attention to a visual comparison that's been made before, both by myself and others...

Isn't it interesting, the shape they chose for their holders?

Yousri

<< <i>

<< <i>PF67CAM if you are lucky. >>



I must agree with Sheriff Sample Slob. The best you could hope for (on a good day) is a 67, and it's borderline CAM... might go, might not.

PR69? DCAM? Fuhgeddaboutit.


I won't berate you for the mistake, as we all have made some.






But let me draw your attention to a visual comparison that's been made before, both by myself and others...

Isn't it interesting, the shape they chose for their holders?






>>




They look similar.... But where is the coin in the second pic???

lordmarcovan

Not a bad looking coin, actually, but I sure hope he didn't pay PCGS PR69 DCAM money for it!

LeeG

Thanks lordmarcovan for your analogy, very funny! I Like It, and they do look similar. Sorry Cameron, no camera to take better picture. This was the picture I downloaded from ebay. Thanks All, Lee

ER

Pictures are terrible. How can anyone grade based on that? JMO.

Yousri

As you said
"The best you could hope for (on a good day) is a 67, and it's borderline CAM... might go, might not. "

Yousri

<< <i>Pictures are terrible. How can anyone grade based on that? JMO. >>



From experience.

LeeG

Paid PCGS Price Guide price at PR65 DCAM.

Yousri

<< <i>

Paid PCGS Price Guide price at PR65 DCAM. >>


Well PCGS price for PR65 DCAM and PR67CAM is the same, so it might work out for you.

Myqqy

My gut reaction from looking at those photos is that it wouldn't make cam at either pcgs or ngc. Regarding the exact grade, there's no way to tell without having the coin in hand. But I would guess there would be hairlines or spots that would keep it around 67 or lower........